GT5 will be a all around better racing sim. Im not talking graphics either, as they will be fairly similar i think. The 16 car field Vs 8(360=wish we had the cell) gives it a bigger edge.djsifer01

Umm dont you wish the PS3 had 48 unified shaders like the 360 gpuhas?

I disagree with GT being the better all round sim. Forza 2 had great physics damage modelling and each car had tons of variables from tinkering with the suspention to looking at real time data of your car's performance. I mean it wasn't the realistic racing sim in the way that GTR was but, Forza 2 has shown us the sheer attention to physics, customisation, damage modelling we can expect from Forza 3.

What have Polyphonic shown us? They have mentioned that there will be damage modelling but we have no idea to what detail, whether it is simple cosmetic or will it affect handling/physics etc.

But half of you Cows are still jumping to the conclusion that GT will blow Forza away in this regard? Don't you think you're taking a little bit of a leap-of-faith?

funny how a year old demo beats forza 3 and lemmings think forza 3 will beat gt5

hahaha

nyctota

Again, you post a one line opinion post. At least give us some reasoning behind your opinion.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

lol, plzz post me a video of Forza 2 from youtube showing the cars doing thesame/better physics than GT5P

ZoomZoom2490

Dont be lazy dude. Go read some reviews

you got destroyed, good game.

How did he get destroyed?? :lol::lol:

Just because you say so? Some of the comments you have been making, things like "GT will make Forza 3 look like a nintendo game?" Have you actually heard yourself or should I say have you actually read what you're posting. Wake up mate, only the most hardcore fanboys says these kinds of one-liners!

Why not try and be a little more objective in your comparisons, yeah? Anyone who is NOT a fanboy of one system or the other will tell you that both games are incredibly close in graphics. We know next to nothing about GTs physics or damage modelling but we do have a fair idea of how detailed Forza's physics and damage modelling from Forza 2.

We also know that Forza 2 was highly regarded in this respect.

Coming from a PC gamers point of view, based on that video, there isn't really much in it at all.

Is it true that the Forzafootagewas in-game while the GT footage was replay?

Edit: They showed the Nascar and WRC for GT, they should have also shown some of the footage of Le Mans from Forza.

Looking through the whole thread, for me it goes like this:

1. Half-life 2
2. Kotor
3. Splinter Cell
4. Halo CE
5. MGS3

[QUOTE="The_Brodeo"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]I have a funnier question: What does GT5 bring that Forza 3 wont have? :Dche5ter666

Where these are good points, is anyone outside the US going to care about nascar? Or rally? This is suposed to be 'the ultimate racing simulator', I'll take DIRT/DIRT2 if I want rally.

With how much content there has been in previous Forza games, it might have it aswell. GT has done rally before but not properly, it was a half baked attempt, sorry guys but it was.

Love your sig Chester :P

say what?Silenthps

I love that Crysis is one of those games you can answer other people with simple screenshots! The game speaks for itself lol

I have a funnier question: What does GT5 bring that Forza 3 wont have? :Daaronmullan

With Polyphonic not giving us any kind of bone to chew on...nothing at the moment.

[QUOTE="patrickjw333"][QUOTE="jerkface96"]

I dont get it, are you guys really insecure or something?, whats is with all you hermits making Crysis graphical comparison threads, we all know that your games look better, and we all have acknowleded it,

just because people are excited about a game like uncharted or any other new game that has nice graphics, doesnt mean you have to uprise and go

ZomG ROFL Teh Crysis still betterz, we already know, so when the sony fanboys and the MS fanboys are doing console comparisons of one another or just talking about who has better graphics, we already know the PC is the best, but we are talking about consoles, so we disclude those.

so enough of this Crysis is the best BS, we already know that!

Espada12

Hermits don't compare it.. cows do, so no it's not a testament to how great the PS3 is.

Exactly, you could try and compare Wiigames to Crysis, doesnt mean they stand up to it lol. Plus, its only really hardcore cows who try to argue the case. When the PS3 is running games at PC resolutions, with PC game level textures, all with open environments we'll talk about comparisons...but until then they're just not going to measure up.

Its a cold hard fact that some of you guys need to face up to. The only real aspect you can compare right now is artistic direction.

[QUOTE="DAZZER7"]

[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]

Mods extend the lifetime of a title.

They do not, however, make the title magically better as is.

I hold Oblivion to be over rated, but i do love Fallout 3

Irick_cb

Some do, some actually make the game better. Stalker CS is a much better game with certain mods installed. Not many games are like this but there are a few games that are a little broken without the community mods.

You overlooked the "as is" part.

I should not have to compensate for the Devs with mods to fix their game.

Just my thoughts.

I agree with your thoughts lol. Its not very good when a game has to be rescued by the community from being a broken game, a vanilla version of the game should..well work. I was merely pointing out that there are rare occasions where a mod/game overhaul do actually improve the game.