PS2 fans have been waiting for 6 years for a new machine to take the throne of their beloved console... or have they? I mean, there have been 120 million PS2s sold, while only 6 million PS3s sold? Doesn't this suggest that PS2 fans don't care about a successor to their console because it is already such a winner of a system? Some PS2 fans have moved onto the 360, butI assumevery few of them are moving onto the Wii (Wii mainly attracts new gamers).
So, I have a question for you PS2 owners. I am a PS2 owner myself (I loved my PS1 as well) and what would like to ask you: Do you really think your PS2NEEDS a successor? The console is cheap, has a massive library of aweome games that rivals the NES and SNES, the graphics are moderate, and its just a great system.
As for me, I have a Wii and 360 to "succeed" my PS2, because the PS3 still needs time to mature if it wants to be a "true" successor to PS2 in my opinion. It is hard to bethe successor of a console that is already succesful and is selling huge. With the Wii and 360, I am offered innovative controls (Wii) and awesome online (360). PS3 still needs time to combat the Wii and 360 from my viewpoint.
Your thoughts? :)
PandaBear86
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't production of PS2 consoles been discontinued? And if so, you gotta think that some people would naturally go for the latest if they were just breaking into gaming or something. And some people think PS3 will be as big someday.
Personally, I want a PS3 for MGS4 and other games. I hope it's games get better and it really opens up (all the more benefit for me since I have a 360 as well :P)
Log in to comment