@texasgoldrush said:
@Dasein808: You have proved nothing with your big orange sentence, you made an inference based on your views. Thats a pseudo-intellectual tactic right there. And here you continue. I hear hooves, it must be zebras. There has to be a plot...there has to. And since you want to reference wikipedia, note that typing in "Cultural Marxism" leads you to the Frankfurt School page topic Cultural Marxist Conspiracy Theory....because basically, its bullshit without any real academic value other than to study the morons who use the term.
And its you out of your depth. Your claim has already been rebutted and you refuse to recognize that 99% of the time, "cultural marxism" is a dog whistle on the right for a racist conspiracy theory rooted in Nazi Germany. You also refuse the fact that the Nazi's were the first to use a term similar to "Cultural Marxism" ("Cultural Bolshevism"), and that the term is 99% of the time, used in a similar fashion today. Pseudo-intellectuals ignore clear facts that debunk their thesis. Then another sign of a pseudo-intellect is to use loaded biased dogwhistles like SJW to attempt to prove your point, which you do. You peddle this theory like William Lund, Pat Buchanan, Lyndon LaRouche, Paul Weyrich, Breitbart, oh and that Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik....lovely company.
Yeah, we're done with your SJW invocation of "dog-whistles."
You couldn't refute the movement's stated goals and you still can't, so we're back to the SJW conversation ending: "racist," "nazi," hyperbole.
You also refuse the fact that the Nazi's were the first to use a term similar to "Cultural Marxism" ("Cultural Bolshevism") and that the term is 99% of the time, used in a similar fashion today.
No, I didn't.
Your dumbass fails to realize that the Nazis hated communists not because many were also Jewish intellectuals, but because they were communists and were the strongest competitors for power in Weimar Germany.
The Final Solution aspect of Nazism occurred nearly a decade later.
Cultural Bolshevism (i.e. a belief in promoting the value of more transgressive/nihilistic forms of modernist arts and culture) stood in direct contrast to the Nazis obsession with classical forms of art and culture.
I believe both can and should exist while proponents of either of these movements seek to eliminate the other.
Your unsourced 99% statistic demonstrates both your immaturity and ignorance.
As I already said, the term "cultural marxis(m)(t)" is regularly used synonymously within university classrooms in spite of your moronic "muh dog-whistle" radical leftist SJW objection.
Fact: The school's founders were radical Marxists.
Fact: They sought to promote the conditions necessary for revolution by assaulting a culture's values and traditions.
Fact: Their ideas are promoted all across the U.S. for those that study English or Philosophy at a university level.
Fact: Most of the people that study them (myself included) recognize(d) that many of their ideas are simply tools that may be utilized to analyze texts, media, and the surrounding world.
Fact: Unfortunately, all tools may also be used as weapons.
Fact: There are a number of ideologically driven (poorly educated) "Marxist/Socialist/Communist" millenials in the U.S. who have either studied, or had superficial hashtag/social media exposure to, these same ideas, and many are actively weaponizing them; because like most young adults, they're exploring the same ideas that most people did at the same age.
Unfortunately, there's now a social media dimension. So where my (and previous) generation's youthful retardation was confined to my/our peer group, their ignorance is being spread virally.
Fact: You are a prime example of the above.
@jereb31 said: For christs sake guys, this is just nauseating to read now.
How about we all take our respective outrage and just bottle it up inside like normal people.
Fair enough.
Log in to comment