@SharkyIzrod What's with all this fanboy crap? Really I don't see MS changing anything that's already successful with Blizzard or Activision. They never meddled in too deep with Halo, they just advertised the shit out of it. I am sure Bungie was very pleased with the advertisements for their game.World of Warcraft II in 2013? Really how much other crap could you pull out of your ass? Lmao. I doubt it will change much knowing Blizzard needs no help in being successful. You'll just see an extra logo (MS's) when you fire up your new Blizzard MMO currently known as Titan.
I went back to PC because of how lame console graphics became quickly. I am looking forward to the new hardware. More so because I am tired of dev's making console PC ports. At least this way the port isn't so dumbed down.
Right now, I really enjoy Skyrim's music, so much so I just purchased the 4 CD set. Even though it changes a little bit from game to game, the theme music for the most part is the same and will be remembered for a very long time.
It's funny that the reviewer is bothered enough by the bugs to knock the score down. Yet a game like Diablo 3 got a pass with issues that completely left people unable to play for days.
Good! Hopefully with the processing power that next gen will bring they can set aside some of that to power their AI and actually be smart and not give us a cheap difficulty level.
I will point out though, I thought the bad guys in GeoW moved around, flanked, took cover pretty good. Even for being meat shields
@LtReviews Don't worry about the development costs, because that $60 game you purchased with all that fidelity will end up costing you around $110 by the time you're done purchasing DLC map/clothing/stuff that should already be in game... They will get their money.
The plus side to the consumer is that if the game fails your only out $60 because you probably won't be picking up DLC.
Deevoshun's comments