Out of all your games, which one, if any, puts the most strain on your PC? I think The Witcher 2 is the most demanding on mine. It runs fine on high to max settings, but I can notice a dip in frame rates in certain areas, and notice higher CPU temps with this title. godzillavskongGhost recon i guess....
Diwashb's forum posts
7950 is way over the price that i am willing to pay.... under 250 strictly.. super stretched budget.7950 is king.
jakes456
Is that an apu? Can u link me your lappy? :D thanksNo need for a discreet GPU with my 4600M, add to that I get well over 7 hours on my battery.
GummiRaccoon
[QUOTE="Guppy507"]
[QUOTE="achilles614"] Their performance difference is completely negligible. Overall the 660 seems to perform BETTER than the 7870 (turns out I made this up, ignore it), but its by such a small margin that it doesn't even matter(I do stand behind this though, that 3-5% difference in Metro 2033 and The Witcher 2 doesn't really matter when it outperforms the 7870 in Crysis 2, Battlefield 3, and Skyrim).
[QUOTE="General_X"]This, if you game at above 1080p the 660's cut-down memory bandwith really hurts it.JigglyWiggly_
If you game at 2560x1600, you shouldn't be buying a sub-300 dollar video card to begin with. 660ti and the 660 do pretty awful in crysis
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6276/nvidia-geforce-gtx-660-review-gk106-rounds-out-the-kepler-family/4
Anything above 35 looks awesome for me .... SO .....no hard feelings eh.... :D[QUOTE="Diwashb"]Leave all the bad quality and other things out of this thread. ninedotUmmm... So what your saying is... "Shut up all you helpful people who are telling me I don't know the difference between a good/bad laptop and let poor suckers take "my" bad advice and buy this piece of crap computer..." If we didn't comment on quality, particularly the bad quality, then how could we allow consumers to make an informed decision? I just don't get people sometimes... Listen budds. This is a 580 bucks laptop. It feels funny how people compare it to the macbook pro which is more than twice its price, Who told you thinkpads have bad build quality? they are built like a tank. Although ugly but they will last...... The quote that u made ...... is irrelevant because this laptop is much better than other ones for the similar price range both for specs and for build quality....
derp woops but the TP quality has dropped aluminum on macbook pro far superior even though the res is low the contrast is better on the apple display still nobody buys 13in mbps, all bout the 15in retina[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="Guppy507"] I don't think you know the specs of the 13 in Macbook Pro... It has a 1280x800 screen and no SSD. And Thinkpads have excellent build quality as well as Apple.Guppy507
I see tons of people with 13 inch MBP, and I always wonder why, especially when they can get the Macbook Air for less money and its a massive improvement in every way lol.
Hard disk size and a full fledged processor buddy....[QUOTE="Guppy507"][QUOTE="achilles614"] Their performance difference is completely negligible. Overall the 660 seems to perform BETTER than the 7870 (turns out I made this up, ignore it), but its by such a small margin that it doesn't even matter(I do stand behind this though, that 3-5% difference in Metro 2033 and The Witcher 2 doesn't really matter when it outperforms the 7870 in Crysis 2, Battlefield 3, and Skyrim).
[QUOTE="General_X"]This, if you game at above 1080p the 660's cut-down memory bandwith really hurts it.achilles614
If you game at 2560x1600, you shouldn't be buying a sub-300 dollar video card to begin with. My advice for more towards the 7870 being a better long term option. The 660 will be held back by memory bandwidth before it runs out of GPU power Amd don't have long term driver support, do they?
Log in to comment