@liuyang61 @ACWH @Daian You'd rather play a racing game on your TV, Liuyang? While I agree about FIFA, I'd much rather play my racing game on a good sized widescreen monitor that's on a table that has a steering wheel attached.
I'm nerdy enough to build in a smaller platform on the side that's lower where I can put the gearstick on to make it feel more like a car :(
@firzok I get the same impression. Damage/crashes don't look like they have the same 'oomph' as the first game either.
And I think it looks like it's all-arcade, not a mix of arcade/simulation like the first one. Don't get me wrong, I like arcade racers, but maybe the reviewer hasn't got his driving license yet?
I've always been one of those guys who never minds what the winner is. Because everyone has their opinion. I always scoffed at those in previous years who complained about GameSpot's picks. I called those people idiots who took things too seriously.But when I saw the nominees, I said to myself that if GameSpot picks Halo 4, then I have to quit GS because I can't waste my time on a website run by people who actually don't have any clue about what they're talking about, yet talk like they're industry experts.
And so, I quit Gamespot.
I know this is unimportant news, but the point of my post is this:
To others who read this post and feel the same. There are two websites I can recommend that are run by people who actually love games and aren't afraid to spend time researching or simply playing a game to death.
Screwattack - If you're a console player
Rock, Paper, Shotgun - If you're a PC player.
Both of those websites are so much more real and down-to-earth than anything you'll read on GameSpot (With the exception of Danny, the only real gamer on GameSpot)
Dugular's comments