Eyezonmii's forum posts

Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"]

He is right, Gabe is a bad representative for Valve and even Valve in general are acting like gods or something towards the PS3, this attitude will bite them in the ass someday and that day has come, look at how detailed RE5, KZ 2, MGS4, Uncharted, Resistance, COD4 and WAW...etc are compared to what Valve have developed for this gen, they made a poor ass port for the PS3, decent looking games for the 360 and they talk like they are the king in graphics and development while a guy like Cliffy B easily surpassed them in quality games.

biggest_loser

Valve are gods in this industry IMO. I mean, they are one of the few developers I can buy a game from without a demo because I know it will be of a high standard.

Most of those games you've mentioned have settled for polished game play - which I'm sure they do quite well, COD4 in particular is an excellent game. But what Valve have provided for this industry is innovation. Not just for their games - HL2, L4D, Portal in particular - but also revolutionised the distribution of games through Steam.

When HL2 first came out it was easily the best looking game on the market and the engine still holds up quite well now.

Please don't even mention Cliffy. Its very easy by their standards to design a generic shooter and polish it to perfection, rather than to take risks with narrative techniques and provide innovation through physics puzzles or co-operative game play.

Gears of War in general took risks and made small innovations to gameplay...of course epic had influences, but they did there own stuff. I don't get what' so special about valve, people seem to just think Half-life, that game is old, and for its time good, sure..(not IMO, gravity gun, WHOOPTY DOO) Only company you should conisder GODS are those who respect every platform. I'm not speaking about everyone in value but this guys a douche. And the guy you quoted, forget cliffy, think EPIC and the whole team, the guy didn't do it all on his own.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="Huff"]Not to jump into the fire, but I didn't like it as much as I thought I would after reading the reviews. I'm not saying its bad, I'm just not blown away by it.patrickjw333
The gameplay is unlike other shooters, your problem looks to be NEEDING TO ADJUST to the realism of gun play...the game is more heavier and has weight to gameplay, due to realism, it will take time getting use to it...but IMO, i love it, i like the fact that its harder to kill, due to the aiming, skill is involved, No auto aim here. People seem to be complaining about the difficulty of shooting targets. Which is fine, but like i said its different, and GG went for insane realism...since recoil, almost everything effects your aim. Don't speak to soon, IMO.

the game is great it has great graphics ( although a bit blurry maybe its just the demo ) and the gameplay is very realistic.

What blur exactly?..i noticed little to NO blur.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]HipHopGamer just wants to become relevant, but he never will. Gabe is successful at what he does, so until HipHopster can emulate his success with worthy journalism, the HippyHoppyHomie needs to shut the trap.67gt500
This wraps it all up quite neatly, thank you!

and what did HHG say that was an epic failure? Its no surprise gabe hates the PS3...we have enough quotes and articles to back that up. I'm tired of Gabes **** excuses, if they guys so good, work on the PS3 and show your talent. Not complain and cry over hardware...No one else does, just you. This isn't 2007.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

He has a point though. Gabe Newell was the one who started it all, when he came out and frankly trashed the PS3, all because it wasn't a PC in a box like the 360 and easy to port games over to. Not that the port overs were exactly brilliant efforts anyway. The Orange Box had a framerate limited at 30fps, whilst the net code for TF2 on 360 was pathetic, they didn't even bother to code for a P2P network, nor did they bother to put in dedicated servers. Shoddy job by Valve, and that's before we come to the lame ass PS3 port over. And even though L4D on 360 has been a lot better the support that Valve promised hasn't been there, yet anyway.

The man has a point. Rather than trash talk a system, either don't develop for it, or put in the effort.

Eddie-Vedder
I agree! Gabe's a fatty :evil:

LMFAO, that srsly made me LOL..the face and all. PRICELESS!
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Zenkuso"]After you tweak the controls to your settings and adjust to the weight your character has with his movements its pretty good, smart and aggressive a.i though so you don't have much time to enjoy the graphics around you :D Really gives a sense of being in a war though which is very nice but the demo could have been a little longer.

You nailed it....couldn't have said it any better. I think people need to remember that if they don't like the oringal settings it can be changed. ALA COD4.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] Why, just because there opinion differs from yours? they think it looks that good....so no fantasy world for them, just there individual tastes and preferences. The game is scoring very high across the board....so much for sub par, huh? Huff

I really wanted it to be good. don't get me wrong.I just feel the reviewers aren't being very honest about their reviews.

Not to jump into the fire, but I didn't like it as much as I thought I would after reading the reviews. I'm not saying its bad, I'm just not blown away by it.

The gameplay is unlike other shooters, your problem looks to be NEEDING TO ADJUST to the realism of gun play...the game is more heavier and has weight to gameplay, due to realism, it will take time getting use to it...but IMO, i love it, i like the fact that its harder to kill, due to the aiming, skill is involved, No auto aim here. People seem to be complaining about the difficulty of shooting targets. Which is fine, but like i said its different, and GG went for insane realism...since recoil, almost everything effects your aim. Don't speak to soon, IMO.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

So what the hell is RE5 suppose to be? A Survival Horror game or TPS? Because that demo sure as hell wasn't scary and the controls were too damn clunky to be considered a TPS.

Capcom must be confused as well.

W1NGMAN-

What is wrong with people? How can you judge a game by its demo? Read the reviews, there are plenty of dark moments in the game, The game is more action/horror now, but still loosely SURVIVAL HORROR. BTW, RE was never scary. Thanks to Co-op and stop and shoot gameplay, the game manages to keep that tension and survival aspect.....love it. Like previous RE titles.

The original RE scared the poop out of me, I really hope this ones scary because I found RE4 to be weaksauce.

how old were you at the time? think about it....Like i've said many times, unless you found empty mansions and weird music scary..the game in general never tried to scare. RE has always been about creating tension/anxiety. RE4/5 still manage to keep that survival aspect and tension, IMO. What the classic Re's did better was the survival aspect, due to much more limited ammo, the camera work (broken security-like camera) didn't show you what was in front of you, so you didn't know what to expect...and i must say it worked, for it times. But now RE4/5 is much, thanks to the stop and pop gameplay it keeps the core gamplay of the original..but everything else RE4 did better.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts

So what the hell is RE5 suppose to be? A Survival Horror game or TPS? Because that demo sure as hell wasn't scary and the controls were too damn clunky to be considered a TPS.

Capcom must be confused as well.

W1NGMAN-
What is wrong with people? How can you judge a game by its demo? Read the reviews, there are plenty of dark moments in the game, The game is more action/horror now, but still loosely SURVIVAL HORROR. BTW, RE was never scary. Thanks to Co-op and stop and shoot gameplay, the game manages to keep that tension and survival aspect.....love it. Like previous RE titles.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

Too bad its pretty much the truth, must be fun livin' in fantasy land.

-Ninja_Dog-

The truth? in YOUR OPINION, sure...but don't throw it around as facts, because most of not every reviews dissagrees with you.

Well fine.But it's obvious their living in a fantasy world too.

Why, just because there opinion differs from yours? they think it looks that good....so no fantasy world for them, just there individual tastes and preferences. The game is scoring very high across the board....so much for sub par, huh?
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

I played it a couple of times and the guns sound weak, not good for a shooter. The graphics are decent but nothing that couldn't be done on 360.

The PS3 control contributes to the weak feeling of the guns alot.

Another subpar game for the PS3.

-Ninja_Dog-

you're uncommon opinion is your uncommon opinion...

Too bad its pretty much the truth, must be fun livin' in fantasy land.

The truth? in YOUR OPINION, sure...but don't throw it around as facts, because most if not every reviews disagrees with you.