[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Sony own the IP. Also, yesss :DSwagSurfSony should probably kill the franchise. After Going Commando, everything sucked imo They just need to tell Insomniac to get back on track. Insomniac has been acting whack as of late, making mediocre games. But I do give them a nod for Resistance 3 as that was their best game in a long time.
II_Seraphim_II's forum posts
Can you please take a screenshot showing me on games on that rig run and how they look? cause I guarantee u that a PS4 will play game smoother and better looking than your $500 PC that would probably have FPS drops playing minecraft.You can build a PC right now for around $500 and never pay a dime for your priveledge to play online. Less expensive games. Are console owners living in a fantasy world?
Heclogit
EDIT: In case you're too dense to realize it, that mine craft comment was merely hyperbole to drive through the fact that such a PC would perform so terribly with the latest game that you really could not consider it a gaming PC with todays games. unless u enjoy gaming at 800x600 with all settings dialed down to low.
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]Crysis: 91 Crysis 2: 86 Crysis 3: 76 Killzone: 70 Killzone 2: 91 Killzone 3: 84 Crysis series wins. Inb4feebleexcuses. Use Gamespot. Crysis 1 got 9.5 from GS yet people still bash it :P Im not gonna lie, Yeah the gameplay was "ok" but Crysis got a 9.5 purely for its graphical prowess. There is nothing about Crysis that makes the game play exactly stand out. Its a decent shooter with some cool power suit mechanics. If it had come out with normal graphics back then, I guarantee you it would never have made AAAE status. But those graphics were so off the charts freaking amazing that even if you gave us alien colonial marines back then with those graphics, it would have gotten atleast an 8.5 on graphics alone.LOL so you have to go back to a game from 2007. I guess was great back then, but it went downhill with each sequel. Can only imagine how shit Crysis 4 will be outside of the visuals...
Mozelleple112
[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]Because Sony would rather their games be better graphically than gameplay wise. You're right, thats why sony made 2 of the highest rated games of all time this gen alone. >.>Yeah, why is it that Sony consoles always seem to lack in performance compared to Microsoft consoles? I've always wondered what that is.
ShaineTheNerd
:lol: Oh man lol, that killed me :lol:Seriously, this guy will give a low score to his wife
lowkey254
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="LustForSoul"]Where's the good gameplay?blue_hazy_basicConsidering KZ2 got a 9.0 and KZ3 got a 8.5 ...I think the good gameplay is to be expected :) But what does it get if you don't include the online portion (which you don't include in the PS4's costs)?!?! :P I agree, online is a big component, but Im in Mozambique right now for a few months, and I pretty much can't play online cause...well internet in most of Africa sucks ass. And I gotta say, its not so bad....you can live. I enjoyed TLOU completely. I played a match or 2 online and it was great fun and would love to play more, but I can live with single player. But once I get back to the states, Imma get my PSN+ on DAY FREAKING ONE! :P
Log in to comment