[QUOTE="General_X"]Yep greater at everything except game library size, game library quality, game prices, community size, in-game overlay, specials, management, and parent company.Zlychop

Funny how you say community size, Steam has been out since 2004. I'd hope the community would be bigger seeing that its been out for that long. Steam lowers the price on games a lot, yeah. But really, who wants to play stuff like this http://store.steampowered.com/agecheck/app/16720/.

Steam throws a lot of stuff like that in your face, the games people actually want to play don't get price drops that actually matter. When origin does a special its 50% off on EVERYTHING, not only some games that Valve wants to sell.

EA has a way more money than Valve btw.

[QUOTE="Zubinen"]The hit detection is fine but the game demands that you have a fast internet connection that can properly handle network smoothing at 100%, anything less and it is your fault for playing a game whose requirements you do not meet and this will become a requirement for future games in general. As for the CQ DLC, it's nice if you're into hipfire range gameplay but you can expect lots of shotguns and PDWs and it's very difficult to do well in Gun Master if you join late. If you do play CQ then at least play nicely and don't C4 the conquest domination flags just because of the small burn radius.SPYDER0416

My connection isn't bad, usually under 100 ping but a bit higher then my buddies. The hit detection isn't terrible, but its not on the level of other titles that put more work in more personal battles. Its not like Battlefield has ever had great hit boxes, and connection wise this is the only title that has given me or my friends trouble with lag spikes, something that just shows a lot more in fast paced gunfights.

I was willing to let slide before since I figured it was a bit less polish for a bit more content and a new engine, but here I think its obvious that faster, personal combat just doesn't work as well as the larger battles with the rules they've made and lines they've drawn in the sand in terms of acceptable issues.

I don't hate CQ, it just really puts a spotlight on BF3's flaws.

[QUOTE="Postmortem123"]

I wouldn't, not with that GPU.

It's a rebadged GT 540m iirc.

kraychik

[QUOTE="JC_Spot"]

http://www.xoticpc.com/sager-np6165-clevo-w150er-p-4344.html This is from the website I got my laptop from. If you upgrade the CPU to an i7 you get everything you get with the HP for around $930, plus you get a 1080p screen as opposed to 768p and you also get the GT650M instead of 630M so that's about 2x as powerful.

RandomWinner

Stupid question, what do I loose out on going with the i5 vs. the i7?

http://www.xoticpc.com/sager-np6165-clevo-w150er-p-4344.html This is from the website I got my laptop from. If you upgrade the CPU to an i7 you get everything you get with the HP for around $930, plus you get a 1080p screen as opposed to 768p and you also get the GT650M instead of 630M so that's about 2x as powerful.

This should help http://lmgtfy.com/?q=noscript+filtered+potential+cross+site+scripting+attempt