KC_Hokie's forum posts

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="Person0"] Its mostly artillery rockets or bombs. Bombs need aircraft, rockets artillery needs a launcher. He hasn't hidden thosePerson0

There are no plans to bomb airbases. Scuds and other missiles have already been moved underground or into civilian areas.

That's what happens when you announce what you're going to do 2+ weeks before you do it.

I doubt all of his weapons are moved underground because that would give the rebels a huge advantage without aircraft bombings and artillery hitting them constantly.

We aren't targeting airbases. So the air force is acting as normal. The delivery systems for chemical weapons will simply be moved out of storage the day after Obama's stupid little strike.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Person0"] The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.

Sure, but only targeting one side could tip the balance. The regime could fall and then hundreds or thousands of troops would be needed just to secure all the chemical weapons.

So theres a chance that someone that might use them can get some compared to a certainty of someone that has used them from keeping them. The Arab league could secure the weapons, the FSA could, NATO could.

No one else is joining us in this attack. If the regime falls everyone will just look to the U.S. to secure the weapons.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] The mission is to downgrade his ability to cause any more chem attacks.Person0
Which is basically impossible. He's already moved his missiles underground or into civilian areas. Assad has had way too much time to prepare.

Its mostly artillery rockets or bombs. Bombs need aircraft, rockets artillery needs a launcher. He hasn't hidden those

There are no plans to bomb airbases. Scuds and other missiles have already been moved underground or into civilian areas.

That's what happens when you announce what you're going to do 2+ weeks before you do it.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

I have a question.. Why is it when there's something ify in the world.. It's only the U.S and pulling their allies into it. Why does this country have to be the one to do this stuff? if we attack, why can't somebody else take care of it? Do we think we are some chosen god or something?

The_Lipscomb

We won't even have the UK with us. Their parliament voted no. France's parliament could vote no as well.

We're doing this alone. Not even a tiny 'coalition of the willing".

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
world policeDaBrainz
Turning into world vigilantes.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]

the US should just bomb both parties.

killzowned24
Exactly. Bomb the nasty people on both sides or do nothing.

The mission is to downgrade his ability to cause any more chem attacks.

Which is basically impossible. He's already moved his missiles underground or into civilian areas. Assad has had way too much time to prepare.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Just read what McCain added at the last minute. This will never pass in the House.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

If they're going to cause mass murder through depleted uranium and ...
Let me stop myself right there. If you call for WAR, there will be hell. So. I don't know what's wise. If the USA or the EU gets involved there will be mass civilian casualties for decades to come.
Either that, or this slaughter in Syria goes on and on.

Maybe, more than anything, we need to hear the people of Syria. Are they willing to let it come to a war on their territory with all ruination and horror that comes with it? It's their country.

Person0
The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.

Sure, but only targeting one side could tip the balance. The regime could fall and then hundreds or thousands of troops would be needed just to secure all the chemical weapons.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

the US should just bomb both parties.

VaguelyTagged
Exactly. Bomb the nasty people on both sides or do nothing.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
I was on the plane this afternoon with Speaker Boehner and wanted to tell him what I thought about Syria, but he was surrounded by secret service and uniformed cops.