LOXO7's forum posts

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Why is this issue more important than auditing the Fed? Oh wait, I forgot where I am. Continue.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

sonic's comment was not racist.

GreySeal9

I say so. Read Howard Zinn's book. It's free online. It's depressing in that it's so racist what America (white people) do/does. Take a look. It's in that book. But don't take my word for it.

No thanks.

We are so doomed. You don't even care. Oh well.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Good job on glomming onto an irrelevant detail.Too bad it's an obvious deflection.

OK. Certain physical advantages that a race does have does not imply that a race is superior. Do you disagree?

GreySeal9

I pointed out that the word might does not have any place in a fact statement. What good is my opinion on racism, while some people disagrees with your question? You supported sonic's comment. Racist!

sonic's comment was not racist.

I say so. Read Howard Zinn's book. It's free online. It's depressing in that it's so racist what America (white people) do/does. Take a look. It's in that book. But don't take my word for it.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"] lol, get a load of this, folks: If you go to that Westboro thread, Condor thinks that he proved all religions are exactly the same because he pointed out that both Islam and Christianity worship a God. lol. CondorCalabasas
Hi, militant atheist reporting here and even I don't consider all religions the same. Similar, perhaps, but most certainly not the same.

Atheism is a fool's religion. Though, all religion is for fools. You are against religion, so you are choose to join one? A true atheist doesn't associate himself with anyone religious, including atheists. Religion is for followers. Leaders don't need someone else to tell them what to do, how to act, leaders make decisions for themselves.

I agree. Atheism is a religion. But people here say, "Nuh uh, because the internet's told me so." A true atheist shouldn't care, but whatever. Believe what you want to believe. Just Stop FORCING Me to believe that Atheism isn't a religion. :P Because I know it is.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Certain phyiscal advantages that a race might have does not imply that that race is superior. Do you disagree?

GreySeal9

Might have? "It's fact," says one. No disagreement said from the other. Since when did the word might come into play? Oh right, always changing.

Good job on glomming onto an irrelevant detail.Too bad it's an obvious deflection.

OK. Certain physical advantages that a race does have does not imply that a race is superior. Do you disagree?

I pointed out that the word might does not have any place in a fact statement. What good is my opinion on racism, while some people disagrees with your question? You supported sonic's comment. Racist!

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Certain races having certain physical traits that are advantageous in certain situations does not imply overall racial superiority.

GreySeal9

Hahaha. Now it's "overall" racial superiority. Keeps on changing.

Certain phyiscal advantages that a race might have does not imply that that race is superior. Do you disagree?

Might have? "It's fact," says one. No disagreement said from the other. Since when did the word might come into play? Oh right, always changing.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Definition of what? I already proved you the answer that there IS no agreed upon definition of racism. So frankly posting one is silly. Second my answer was in response to the dude's sentence. Get over yourself....not everything is about you.LJS9502_basic

Yes, everything is certainly about me. All of your post are actually about me. You just don't realize it yet.

In all seriousness, you need to supply a definition that supports your assertions that the OP is racist. There is no reason anybody should take your word for it, especially if you're maintaining that another person is "wrong".

If you cannot provide that definition, it would be helpful to simply say so.

I believe you already agreed that there is no one correct definition of racism. So this is all smoke and mirrors so that you fool others into thinking you are making points. Frankly the TC is racist. Why else would he post a thread about different races? Are you a minority by any chance? I've noticed you in other race related threads and you always strike me as a bit sensitive about it.

Wtf? TC is right. Of course you wouldn't know because you are probably white. But take it from me without source if you were black you would see the world in a truly different way. And then it's typical to call the TC a racist for pointing out the obvious prejudice against minorities. It's an unwindable war for minorities until people start waking up. But you have to do it yourself.

I know I said I wouldn't provide source or maybe I didn't "say" that? I don't know. But this helped me see the Racism in the United States history. And it might help you too.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

You assume that reducing chance of skin cancer is racial superiority. It's not. It's a difference based on factors relating to climate, but it doesn't make blacks inherently superior.

GreySeal9

I'm assuming a large portion of the population thinks cancer is bad. So yes. I'll take any type of chance of not getting cancer. Like in Oblivion, different races gets you different benefits. Apparently, this isn't racist though.

Certain races having certain physical traits that are advantageous in certain situations does not imply overall racial superiority.

Hahaha. Now it's "overall" racial superiority. Keeps on changing.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Only the TC never actually said any of that. I don't understand why people on this site still can't argue based on what people say.

I still don't see how entitlement programs have an inherent connection to racist.

GreySeal9

TC posted a picture that had words on it. We can only talk about what he physically typed instead of the image he posted when we say, "TC said this. TC said that..." ?

Good for you? How about, you still don't see how entitlement programs have an inherent connection to discrimination?

I didn't say we can only talk about what he physically typed. Neither him nor the picture said what you said he said.

And no, I don't think you've made your case in regards to entitlement programs.

Holy ****! I don't know what you're talking about.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"] Black people are more resistant to skin cancer than white people because their skin is darker. That's not racist. That's an actual scientific fact. I just debunked your theory.GreySeal9

GreySeal would disagree with you. Oops. He didn't. But he did say, "notions of racial superiority need to apart of the equation." I guess he was mistaken on that part. Having a darker skin is not a superior trait to have by reducing the chance of skin cancer.

You assume that reducing chance of skin cancer is racial superiority. It's not. It's a difference based on factors relating to climate, but it doesn't make blacks inherently superior.

I'm assuming a large portion of the population thinks cancer is bad. So yes. I'll take any type of chance of not getting cancer. Like in Oblivion, different races gets you different benefits. Apparently, this isn't racist though.