[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="Super-Mario-Fan"]

Right, but you forget to factor in the sun, which provides energy for the CO2. And when you have more of it, you get more heat produced. Scienctists have sampled ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, and have found a stable pattern of 200 ppm CO2 from 10,000 years ago until the 19th century (the industrial revolution). After that, the rates steadily climbed. Today, that figure is nearly doubled at 400 ppm. Coincidence? I think not.

Super-Mario-Fan

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="Super-Mario-Fan"]

It's pretty simple, actually.

Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas. It traps heat. Humans drive cars, fly planes, and still burn fossil fuels, which in turn release more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Of course, most of the CO2 made naturally by organisms (ex. breathing) gets abosrbed by plants and alage, producing oxygen. However, in the last 100 years or so, we've tipped the balance in CO2's favor with our fossil fuels. Too much CO2 getting released. Not enough of it getting abosrbed back into the Earth.

Super-Mario-Fan

Right, but you forget to factor in the sun, which provides energy for the CO2. And when you have more of it, you get more heat produced. Scienctists have sampled ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, and have found a stable pattern of 200 ppm CO2 from 10,000 years ago until the 19th century (the industrial revolution). After that, the rates steadily climbed. Today, that figure is nearly doubled at 400 ppm. Coincidence? I think not.

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]I would just prefer that these regs go through congress rather a regulatory agency with too much power.DaBrainz

I would just prefer that these regs go through congress rather a regulatory agency with too much power.DaBrainz

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="lx_theo"] lolSuper-Mario-Fan

It's pretty simple, actually.

Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas. It traps heat. Humans drive cars, fly planes, and still burn fossil fuels, which in turn release more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Of course, most of the CO2 made naturally by organisms (ex. breathing) gets abosrbed by plants and alage, producing oxygen. However, in the last 100 years or so, we've tipped the balance in CO2's favor with our fossil fuels. Too much CO2 getting released. Not enough of it getting abosrbed back into the Earth.

Thread title doesn't make sense, nor does the original post. If you want a list of scientists, you'll have to contact the publishers of all the scientific journals that have included papers that suuport the idea of anthropogenic global warming.

Or you could spend countless hours in the library of a large university finding those papers. Either way, I'm sure it's easier for you just to say that since there isn't a streamlined list for you, it doesn't actually exist and there isn't a consensus at all.

Ignorance must be bliss.

jimkabrhel

I mention a list because I did find one, but the stupid person that I am didn't bookmark the page. But I do remember this name, Paul Ralph Ehrlich. He was on this list. He believes that the human world population is too large and in order to survive we must stop our own growth.

I just found this page, which falsely states that Ehrlich was a presidential adviser on the environment. Although Ehrilich co-authored a book with the new senior adviser of science and technology to President Obama, John Holdren, titled The Population Bomb. Holdren, a senior adviser to the president of the United States thinks overpopulation is an issue. Yikes!

Anyways the United Nations page is about the US not acting as a leader in human controlled climate change. But I can't just trust this UN article because the EPA has the ear of federal judges. If the world accepts we are responsible for the warming of the Earth and follows climate changing protocol two things will happen. One nothing, because humans don't have an affect on climate change, and two another measure must be taken. This extra step is population control.

My ignorance to you.

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="Serraph105"]

Yeah I saw that the other day, but I didn't think it warranted a topic given the large consensus among scientists that Global Warming is actually happening.

In some random unrelated news the town I live in topped a 76 yearhigh today at 106 degrees Fahrenheit and it will be even hotter tomorrow. Also on a somewhat related note (but not to global warming I assure you) the crops here aren't doing so well this year on account of the lack of precipitation.

Serraph105

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="lx_theo"] Don't worry about it, it'll go right over your head.lx_theo

lollx_theo

[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"]Looking at how 18 year old's seem to be to immature for sex I'd say it would be a bad idea. Brosephus_Rex

You are a bad person and a sh!tty Catholic (see: alcohol).