LOXO7's forum posts

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="lx_theo"][QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="lx_theo"] lol

Please enlighten me with your knowledge.

Don't worry about it, it'll go right over your head.

You're crazy.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Yeah I saw that the other day, but I didn't think it warranted a topic given the large consensus among scientists that Global Warming is actually happening.

In some random unrelated news the town I live in topped a 76 yearhigh today at 106 degrees Fahrenheit and it will be even hotter tomorrow. Also on a somewhat related note (but not to global warming I assure you) the crops here aren't doing so well this year on account of the lack of precipitation.

Serraph105
Anthropogenic* global warming scientists consensus. We had a mild winter. An extreme St. Patrick's week of 80 degree weather that's screwed up a lot of crops and just vegetation in general. Weird weather.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="lx_theo"] lol

Please enlighten me with your knowledge.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]It's okay to spend money and resources on something that doesn't exist? Lets have this fake alien invasion in a world wide scale. Al Qaeda attacks us because we are free. So we got to defend against them. They seem to be anywhere the US military goes. They're in the states already or there would be no need for the mock security called the TSA.Inconsistancy

Wait, it doesn't exist?

Since when does 'consensus of scientists' mean something clearly doesn't exist? Do you have any evidence to backup this claim?

----

In the shortest amount of words possible, in science: Law = the empirical observation, hypothesis = attempt to describe something, Theory = refined hypothesis that cannot be realistically invalidated. It(theory) doens't mean 'idea' in science.

Just because you don't feel like believing in something, doesn't make it false. You can pray away gravity all you want, swear it doesn't exist, but the second you find a cliff and jump off you'll start falling and be subject to it anyway.

That's what I keep hearing, but I haven't saw the list of these scientists. I looked it up and what I found was something to do with the UN and a list of 3,000 scientists in 1997 saying they believe it is true. The 98% of scientist stat is interesting and I would love to see that list to delve into it deeper. But that's all I read about that 97-98 number. So it is really a hypothesis that humans effect the global climate? The law of gravity and hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming seem to be complete opposites. There is no death penalty like gravity for letting carbon emissions be unregulated. You jump of a cliff you will die. What is the death of not regulating these emissions?
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Looking at how 18 year old's seem to be to immature for sex I'd say it would be a bad idea. ferrari2001
I agree. I think the age for everything 18 should be 21. Voting, prison, drugs, gambling, sex. I am also a Catholic.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
It's okay to spend money and resources on something that doesn't exist? Lets have this fake alien invasion in a world wide scale. Al Qaeda attacks us because we are free. So we got to defend against them. They seem to be anywhere the US military goes. They're in the states already or there would be no need for the mock security called the TSA.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] People will pretend they didn't know that so they can complain more. Fox is already doing this in fact.Ace6301

Are these words interchangable?

Fox is made up out of people. People are not Fox. They are not interchangeable. That said fox IS the largest news source in the US and today they had a headline implying that the individual mandate became a tax. Look at the topic title here as well.

(Foxwill pretend they didn't know that so they can complain more.Peopleis already doing this in fact.) I just want to know if you think Fox pretended they didn't know so they can propagate their stories?

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

This is a theory in which I do not believe in, right now. I don't have all the facts. I hear there is a 98% consensus of scientists who believe thatanthropogenic global warming is true. I haven't saw this list yet, but would like to. These regulations are for no serious purpose. It doesn't make people progress. The EPA will get bigger just to enforce these regulations. Those are jobs I guess. That's where we are headed in the US. Everyone is going to have a government job. And their responsibility is to watch other Americans. Big government, more taxes, less freedom.

http://www.lohud.com/viewart/20120628/NEWS05/120628001/Federal-court-upholds-EPA-s-global-warming-rules?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|News|s

I compare this fake enemy to the mock WWIII Peter Schiff says we should have if WWII really did get us out of the Great Depression by spending all of our money on the war. These EPA regulations aren't as big as a world war, but it's a start. The regulations force businesses to combat this fake global threat and more government jobs to make sure the businesses don't break the law.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyW-o-Pr92M

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

People will pretend they didn't know that so they can complain more. Fox is already doing this in fact.Ace6301

Are these words interchangable?

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="LOXO7"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] People will pretend they didn't know that so they can complain more. Fox is already doing this in fact.Ace6301

What did you mean with this? You're saying Fox as in people.

You haven't seen what Fox is saying yet?

No. I get my news elsewhere. But I hear CNN said the law was 5 to 4 against first then it changed its story. So Fox is people?