Considering my TV cost a whole hell of a lot more than my monitor, I'd say persoanlly it costs about the same for hardware. Software, however, is cheaper on PC.donalbanePretty desperate to include HDTVs to price, Considering people use thre tvs for Television more then gaming while monitors are used soley for the PC
Maneil99's forum posts
Well same goes for anything? Console gamers can easily rent games, buy games cheaper and trade them in. And waiting until games come down to 5$ is not practical for most people.I guess it depends on the amount of games you get. I have 466 Steam games and saved an average of around $5 for each game, so I saved over 2k, which easely erases the cost of a PC.
ArchoNils2
[QUOTE="Peredith"]
[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]
Crysis+Warhead have plenty of variety.
Stalkerfieldsis
No they don't. You're staring at the same textures again and again and again. Nothing stands out, because it all looks the same.
This is variety. All these screenshots are from 15 minutes of gameplay.
Another location
Why aren't you acknowledging my post? Oh wait, I know why, because you don't wanna acknowledge a post that proves you wrong!!! Go be in denial somewhere else because you have clearly failed here.
You can not argue Rage has more variety then crysis. Crysis is limited to one Island however the switch to Frozen is a big difference as is the alien ship but thats it. Crysis is like this70% Forest/jungle
10% Ice forest
5% Alien Ship
5% Land Carrier
10% beach
Crysis Warhead:
55% Junlge
20% Ice
10% Mines
15% Air Field
how are those two pics related? Also what game is that? And some fancy water does not equal a gen ahead... Nevermind you are trollinThis is a gen ahead:
To:
mitu123
HDTV can be used for TV and movies, A monitor is a monitor, spending 99% of the time displaying the pc, counting the HDTV sounds pathetic.
Being medical student doesn't mean **** Police officers aren't ****
[QUOTE="Maneil99"]Nope 8xaa and I get drops into the 30s. Its unacceptable. This is of course using mods. I still doubt that you have a GTX 680, because my GTX 560 can play Crysis maxed out with mods with 4xAA and still get 40 FPS average at 1680x1050. Try 1920x1200 with 8xaa and mods, not gonna go so well.[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Then your doing something wrong or you are lying. Because my old 8800GT's in SLI could play Crysis on very high at 1680x1050 with an average of 35 fps. 04dcarraher
Eh, I suppose, but we're not even entirely sure what next gen will even look like. Also, why are graphics only being spoken about? Why not resolution, AA, AF, physics, AI, pop-in rate, and overall scale? You can't simply single out one feature of a game and say it's terrible. You have to judge as a whole and I'd say that some PC games certainly fill the bill. Anyway, some of the visuals might not be next gen, but I'd say that performance certainly is which tends to be a higher selling point for me. I don't think many people are gonna buy a next gen console if its gamesl ooks like the witcher 2 and crysi, there is no holy **** factor like there was with killzone 2 and gears of war[QUOTE="Maneil99"]
What he says is true, no pc game looks a gen ahead, not any I've played atleast. I doubt any of you can argue different
Grovilis
[QUOTE="Maneil99"]Then your doing something wrong or you are lying. Because my old 8800GT's in SLI could play Crysis on very high at 1680x1050 with an average of 35 fps. Nope 8xaa and I get drops into the 30s. Its unacceptable. This is of course using mods.Crysis with mods is still unplayable for me with a 680 gtx so I don't se the point posting pics if its unplayable..
04dcarraher
[QUOTE="Maneil99"]
Crysis with mods is still unplayable for mewith a 680 gtx so I don't se the point posting pics if its unplayable..
lawlessx
well that's just to bad
Did you read my gpu? if its unplayable for me its unplayable for most people. 30 fps drops is not playable with 8xaa
Log in to comment