in terms of quality Sony won

all those elements put together, but if I had to choose one single element, then gameplay would be it.

*scratches head*

Here one big giveaway that it will not MS OWNS HALO AND ANYTHING WITH THE NAME HALO ON IT. But hey you can play Flopzone 3 LOL

Ultra_Combo

we could use both the gamepad and motion controls next gen. to each game its own ^^

[QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"]Which flop is worse GT5 or Killzone 3?jimmypsn

GT5 flop was epic. I saw the explosion from my house. The light of failure was blinding.

i dont want to start trouble or anything but is there a way to reach gs reviewers who flops ps3 games so we can set up a meeting and have a clean fight?

_SWAG_

killzone3 is not a flop so stop calling it a flop. it looks better than any shooter on any console imho once again killzone3 is not a flop its amazing. 2011 is still the year of the ps3 imho

_SWAG_

you're on SW dude, it's a flop. rules are rules. get over it

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

didint 360 get the flopped version of dead space 2?

MFDOOM1983

How did it flop when there was just average hype? Yes people were excited for the game but the hype scale is nowhere near what K3 was. Not even close.

when it comes to 3rd party games the 360 offers a wider library than the 360, the differences in terms of performance are similar, just sometimes devs don't bother "understanding" the hardware of the ps3, so you see games like RDR running in sub-hd and graphics sacrifices on the ps3.

also, there are very big games that need multiple discs that are a better fit for ps3, because on the 360 the devs need to cram all that data into dvd's which can only store up to 6.8 gb each.. so sometimes they need to compress all this data in order to put it in 1-2 discs.