Evolution is a fact, or more accurately, a collection of facts that correlate with precision used to form an over-arching theory (not hypothesis) that is backed up by vast empirical evidence and numerous attempts to disprove it. Creationists don't like it because it challenges the first source they heard and don't like to re-evaluate things for their own.
Some christians don't like it because it pretty much eliminates all telological arguements. Paley, Aquinas, that can all go out the window now. It would be pretty hard to be an atheist, even if one only believed in an aristotlien non-interventionist prime cause and mover; such is the strength of telological arguements when one looks at the complexity of just a single organelle, let alone an organism.
If you don't already know of it, look up the debate between Bishop Samuel Wilberforce and Thomas Huxley.
Log in to comment