Are you Hurt? Just because I come here actually tell you there's a difference in a calling a part a bottleneck a "weaker part" and what it means to have an actual bottleneck for hardware.[QUOTE="NailedGR"]
1) 04 keeps referring to the 4870 when it is actually the 4850 in question
1a) This brings his critical thinking into question especially since he is getting corrected and he keeps using the wrong card.
2) He is using the wrong definition of the word.
2a) There are multiple meaning words, meaning that you can apply the same word to different situations and they will actually mean different things.
2b) 04 is using the more basic non-specific meaning of the word, which is not the meaning used when referring to computer hardware.
3) In computer hardware a bottleneck is ONLY the slowest performing part that you have for that situation.
4) In the current generation, especially at higher resolutions the GPU is going to be the bottleneck 90% of the time. You see this when people run tests at super high resolutions, and whatever gpu you are testing gets the exact same frame rate no matter what CPU they are paired with.
So to sum up: 04 is wrong and keeps arguing, not over if there is a bottleneck or not, but the fact that a bottleneck can exist. Which it can, and there are hundreds of articles to back that up.
So to 04, you are the minority here, the onus is on you to prove your point, get us an article saying what you are saying or stop posting because you are seriously misinforming people who are actually trying to learn.
04dcarraher
Big whoop 4850 4870 whatever its still the same idea. As long as you learned that there is proper usage in the word bottleneck then just saying a certain item is just weaker. We are all here to help out and learn and I hope you learn the difference.
"because I said so" is not a good retort
Log in to comment