That's odd, my gamestop and bestbuy are filled with PS3's while X360's and Wii's are sold outIIRS3II_H1TMAN

Mortal kombat died for me after mk2.

Advid-Gamer

[QUOTE="JAB991"]

I don't think many people care that it's more precise than a Wiimote with WMP. I think people are mad at how shameless of a creation Move is.

This!

I have nothing against Sony and love my PS3. But the move can suck it. I will take my Wiimote and Wii Motion Plus ove the Playstation "Wiive" any day of the week. Sorry man. Wii did it first. And Wii will do it better.

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

From a technical standpoint, the PS Move is far more advanced than the Wiimote. The PS Eye camera can detect the position and distance of the glowing light, while the Move's internal sensors assist with tilt detection and boosting overall accuracy. The Wiimote on the other hand has a hard time telling how far you are from the TV (unless you have MotionPlus), so it would be laughable to suggest the Move is inferior. The Move is being released four years after the Wiimote, so of course it would have to be better. Sony would be stupid if they cannot out-perform a controller technology from 2006, so of course they can do a better job with four years of improvements.

Websites like Joystiq and Gizmodo have actually used the PS Move in HANDS-ON tech demos during GDC recently, and they have openly stated that the PS Move was better and more accurate than the Wiimote. They said that the controller was smarter, more accurate, and was simply more fleshed-out than the Wiimote... even with MotionPlus! Check out more info about Move here:

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/03/11/playstation-move-and-game-previews-roundup/

Thats right Wii owners, you can stay safe behind the whole "you cannot say the PS Move is better because you havent used it yet", but all current *hands-on* reviews of the Move controllers indicate that the Wiimote is far inferior. Can't wait for the Move to be released. Thats when PS3 owners have better graphics, better online, hard drives, Blu-ray, AND superior motion controllers. What advantages will the Wii have left apart from Mario Party or the next Zelda re-hash game?

In the end, it won't matter if the technology is superior if the Move is poorly supported or is viewed as an afterthought by PS3 owners. If there aren't enough good games that support the Move to justify purchasing it, then its wasted effort on Sony's part.

From a technical standpoint, the PS Move is far more advanced than the Wiimote. The PS Eye camera can detect the position and distance of the glowing light, while the Move's internal sensors assist with tilt detection and boosting overall accuracy. The Wiimote on the other hand has a hard time telling how far you are from the TV (unless you have MotionPlus), so it would be laughable to suggest the Move is inferior. The Move is being released four years after the Wiimote, so of course it would have to be better. Sony would be stupid if they cannot out-perform a controller technology from 2006, so of course they can do a better job with four years of improvements.

Websites like Joystiq and Gizmodo have actually used the PS Move in HANDS-ON tech demos during GDC recently, and they have openly stated that the PS Move was better and more accurate than the Wiimote. They said that the controller was smarter, more accurate, and was simply more fleshed-out than the Wiimote... even with MotionPlus! Check out more info about Move here:

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/03/11/playstation-move-and-game-previews-roundup/

Thats right Wii owners, you can stay safe behind the whole "you cannot say the PS Move is better because you havent used it yet", but all current *hands-on* reviews of the Move controllers indicate that the Wiimote is far inferior. Can't wait for the Move to be released. Thats when PS3 owners have better graphics, better online, hard drives, Blu-ray, AND superior motion controllers. What advantages will the Wii have left apart from Mario Party or the next Zelda re-hash game?

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]LBP is just ONE game from Sony that lacks a storyline. Its okay if just a small portion of your games lack a storyline IMO. But with Nintendo, pretty much all games lack a storyline. Mario, Zelda, Metriod, all those games have weak storylines.musicalmac

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]Yes, I understand that. But, just because you have a strong storyline doesn't mean the gameplay has to be compromised in any way. I can name many games with great storylines and great gameplay. I wouldn't even know where to begin :Dmusicalmac

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]LBP was about customisation, so focusing on a core storyline wouldn't suit it. But look at Sony's other games like Ratchet and Clank, Jak and Daxter, as well as their old PS1 games like Spyro the Dragon. They had decent stories, much better than just recuing the princess :)musicalmac

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]It might not need a strong story, but I'm sure a multi-billion dollar company can do a better job than just "rescue the princess". Even my 9-year old niece can come up with something better than that.musicalmac

For real. Little Big Planet's story was out of this world.

Oh wait.