[QUOTE="patriots7672"]Once again I say how baffled I am that the Wii is outselling the PS3 and 360. The best system is in last place, and the worst system is in first. I stay baffled. azad_champ

You're not the only one baffled...

It all makes sense. MTV has more viewers then both National Geographic and Discovery Channel put together.

Bigger userbase =/= better.

SNES had some of the industry's most memorable exclusives of all time. Of course gamers will get disappointed. Mainstream gaming has officially reached a new low.

Zelda yes, Mario no thanks. hopesfall2own

[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Cannot really be compared to high profile games such as S.T.A.L.K.E.R Clear Sky or Far Cry 2.

Looks mediocre tbh.

heretrix

No, I tend to be harsh. I'm not going to give Nintendo's console ''special treatment'' just because they decided to go with low tech.

Platformer of the Year? Yes.

Game of the Year? nah.

SMG is the best of its genre, so that alone is quite an achievement.

Cannot really be compared to high profile games such as S.T.A.L.K.E.R Clear Sky or Far Cry 2.

Looks mediocre tbh.

Who remembers the 'We are serious about online' quote from last year? :lol:6matt6

I still haven't forgotten about that. But Nintendo can get away with it, considering their fanbase have accepted the poor online support.

These days, whatever the media exposes, the sheeple accept it. But with a response like that, its basicly the middle finger to their dedicated fanbase.

Nintendo's priorities are more then obvious with this E3 conference. Animal Crossing hardcore, what the wtf Reggie?

Features like voice chat should have been implemented in their online service in the first place. Its not an anouncement I can get excited about.

Nintendo's priority and focus is obviously the non-gamers. And you know, I don't care. I just want to see Zelda, and a Mario/Donkey Kong platformer. Games that are entertaining and are generally easier recognised among the more traditionally and dedicated gamers.

Did they show it? Not even an anouncement. Let alone a short teaser that would have satisfied us like the GoWIII teaser by Sony.

What does this mean? Basicly a middle finger to their loyal fanbase. All the energy and time they invested in these peripherals has slowed the development process of the real worthy quality Nintendo games.

I've said this a long time ago. Nintendo is changing their priorities. And so am I! My Wii is a secondary gaming console I often use when my friends come to visit me. After that its serious business, and I immediately go back to playing Civilization, Warcraft, S.T.A.L.K.E.R, TF2 or CoD4.

The Wii has so much wasted potential. Portal on the Wii? Perhaps Bioshock? These games could have been excellent Wii exclusives. Very suitable games for that particular control scheme with the Wii mote. Why aren't we seeing serious games such as Mass Effect or Elder Scrolls on Wii? Poor third party support. Terrible even.

At first I was very fascinated by the idea of motion sensing capable gaming system. I've been starting to dislike it after I found out that Mario Galaxy would work perfectly fine with a regular controller. But this is not a complaint. I'm happy Nintendo tried something new. But there are so many other aspects Nintendo failed at.

Still no proper online support. Imagine playing Team Fortress 2 on Wii... onlne without those frustrating friend codes that restrict me communicating with the online community.

Wasted potential Nintendo...