Pretty sure this was in the trailer. Honestly i love that they are remaking it. the community was crying for a remaster for so long and i was always thinking it's the 1st game, it's not the best and there are a lot of mechanics missing in this, a remaster now is going to be extremely boring. no jumping attacks, no rolling to destroy debris, everything was just very basic. if you played it as your 1st Souls game like me it's fine, but i wouldn't want to play Demon's Souls after playing all the other Souls games. Now a remake really was the 2nd best thing they could have done (after making an original game of course), as all the mechanics we have gotten used to will probably be implemented. I just hope for one single thing and that is that they don't make the game shorter than the original. that's all i want.
@Atzenkiller: yes i was mostly talking about your use of the word "decent". i don't use my phone much at all. i use the phone to call, whatsapp, google, set alarms and use the calendar. my phone is completely quiet, except for calls, which is why i sometimes don't look at my phone for hours. i have a huawei that i bought for a little over 100€ and it does all those things without problems. i call that a decent phone.
@santinegrete: exactly. i mean i do wish it was completely black, because it would just fit better with my furniture, but the design is totally fine with me and i find it still very toned down compared to what they could have done with it. nothing too fancy or extravagant, it just looks like a modern computer.
tobey's movies will always have a place in my heart. nowadays superhero movies are made a lot and with little care, which is why most of them are really bad. back then they were something special. personally i liked adrew's spiderman the best though, it was just the most fun to watch. tom is also good, but he still has this "really? you are casting this rol for the 3rd time?"-vibe for me. i feel like Tom is also the most family-friendly spiderman, which isn't something i particularly enjoy. but none of them are bad for the role.
@trust2112: i agree. this is simply discrimination (towards non-gay people). unless lgbtq are underemployed as actors, but i doubt that.
in my country when a company is looking to hire it's usual to give someone with a disability preference over someone who doesn't have one. but i hardly see a sexual preferance as a disability.
looking at it like this, it would be both discriminating towards heterosexual people and calling homosexuality a disability at the same time. oof!!
RaveNRolla's comments