@tuna_walker: i was about to write the same, but they actually do mention that that child daycare shooter will be available at launch, so technically there's news.
@brandxbeer: it's a grey zone. the ps+ games are basically enticement. what people want and pay for is the ability to play online. since no one can tell what the "free" games will be two months from now the games themselves are arguably not the product, hence they are an addition. they are sort of free if you look at it that way.
@deviltaz35: anybody that wants to play it probably has it. the free games are a nice feature, but in reality they don't often do much for me, exactly for that reason. i bought a new ds4 (controller) yesterday and the store gave away free copies of the last of us remastered with the controllers. it's a nice gesture, but i declined as i don't know anyone that has a ps4 and hasn't played that yet.
i guess i'm the one that's posting "meh" for once. i'd rather have interesting indie games than boring shooters.
the problem with "big titles" on ps+ is mostly that if i would want to play them i already have them. honestly though i'm not bothered at all by this, because even though i regularly add the ps+ games to my library, the last time i actually played one must be about 3 years ago.
i'd definitely like to try that out on a later playthrough. sounds like a progressive feature. it's been such a long time since dancer in the dark, the 1st movie i watched that had additional features for blind people to "see"/experience it. has this not been tried on videogames before? i mean it's obviously much harder to realise for an interactive game than for a movie.
RaveNRolla's comments