Rushaoz's comments

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@immdev: I'm sure DICE cared about your feelings and thoughts when they made the game. The rest of us who aren't insecure little twats will enjoy this game. Besides, you know you're going to buy it. And when you do, I hope you get assassinated by a butch lesbian queer disabled xir blue hair colored or whatever thing with cybernetic prosthesis at every turn in the multiplayer just to piss you off even more.

Seriously, it's just a video game. Get a life, pal.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Flyin3lvl: On the other side of that coin, having it all is EXACTLY the problem we have today. Every gamer is so self entitled over their measly $60. There isn't a group of people that bitch nearly as much and are self entitled beyond measure than the gaming community. But ignorance is bliss right?

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Rushaoz

The new Tomb Raiders are Uncharted clones with a few RPG elements thrown in. I enjoyed playing both of them but Uncharted is unforgettable. Uncharted 4 is one of the best games I've ever played.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

RANT TIME

I'll come back and play this again when the game is actually fucking finished, the DLC is baked into the game and not tacked on at the end. This is literally the worst Final Fantasy game for me. So much potential. I love this game and hate it at the same time. The story is meh and it's fragmented. The characters weren't delved into enough so by the end of the game I didn't give a shit about them. The open world was absolutely useless and littered with fetch quests. I'll take a linear Final Fantasy if it means the pacing of the story is better.

This game sucked at everything a Final Fantasy game should be about.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SPOILER BELOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Plus, the hardest enemy in the game can be beat with the ring of Lucii and at the end of the game you get to fly the fucking car around as an airship, which would normally be awesome, except for the fact there's only one fucking place you can go...

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ph1nn:

No way. I loved Bloodborne don't get me wrong but when I beat it I was happier about not having to play it again than I was about actually beating it. The game was just stressful. And no I'm not a FromSoftware nub lol I've beaten DS3 fives through. Also the story was almost non existent. Bloodborne was all about gameplay and masochism lol.

Witcher 3 on the other hand while having a much less fun battle system makes up for it with it's story, plot, voice acting and most of all the amazing side missions and story telling.

The worse thing about the Witcher 3 to me is that it did such an amazing job with side missions that it has raised the bar very high. When i play other games and the side missions DON'T go off on a super interesting 1-2 hour tangent I become very disinterested.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@schiff11: Did you even play The Witcher? I had to play the Witcher 2 twice because I couldn't grasp the complex political story going on. It's the most mature game series I've played to date and you're saying it's for teenagers? Ironic because BotW has an art style that naturally calls out to the younger crowd.

Dude, you might be retarded.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As someone who's played both, I think gameplay wise BotW is superior to the Witcher 3 when it comes to gameplay. Story and plot the Witcher 3 is superior.

Loved them both but seeing as how I've gone through W3 twice now and only once through BotW The Witcher wins this one out for me.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ishsgames: I wanted to wait for the new 6 series as well. Ended up caving and bought the TCL P607. No regrets here. God damn thing is amazing. Local dimming could be better but let's face it, it will never be perfect. It's pretty damn good. I'm just a snob. Blacks are stupid deep but you still see that white halo local dimming is known for sometimes. The gaming performance on the otherhand is phenomenal though. 14ms input lag. Gaming on my PC and PS4 Pro has been a treat. And I've turned into a bluray addict because of this TV.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jgarbuz: Did you skip the NES? There were much harder games on the NES than any of the Dark Souls games will ever be.

The problem is gamers today are spoiled. Getting their hands held in nearly every game so when something comes around that doesn't cater to a gamers competence it gets labeled exactly as you labeled it. In reality the Souls games are just hard games that are far from impossible to beat.

Avatar image for Rushaoz
Rushaoz

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Rushaoz

@GunEye: Digital Foundry has a video on your exact concerns.

In a nutshell, this game is an enhanced version of DS1 running at 4k 60 FPS. Good for people like myself who haven't played it but probably a pass for those who have.

I will say this; playing a Dark Souls game at 60 FPS is a MUCH better experience than playing it at 30. I played DS3 at 1440p 30 FPS on my gaming laptop. Played it again a year later on my gaming rig at 1440p 60 FPS and it felt like a whole new game and I was much better at combat due to the responsiveness.