SoBaus' forum posts

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="DRAGONPIECEZ"]

I realize now that they were within their rights if they saw it in the car, but what about the fact that they were capped? I thought transportation of alcohol was legal above the age of 18.

DRAGONPIECEZ

what state are you in? all of them have different laws. But regardless its probably possesion by a minor. Just say it was your dad's booze or your dad's car... probably end up getting a plea for a $20 moving violation... basically less than a speeding ticket.

I live in NY, and yeah that's the plan. I would be happy with that; basically I'd be grateful for anything that won't go on my record. (I can deal with anything that's monetary related.)

your not the first person under 21 that got caught with some booze, believe it or not.... i dont know alot about NY law.. but even if they go for the full monty and dont plea you down they will probably just say something along the lines of "dont do it again and we will nolle it"

unless you freak out and punch someone at the court i think its safe to say there will be no record of it ever happening.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

[QUOTE="epicman129"]

Lol I normally don't like putting pics of me on the internet, but if you guys can help then here

VisigothSaxon

Where's the ugly? :|

Yeah, you don't look very ugly. Although I am not a fan of the hair its a bit too in the middle between long and short in my opinion.

just say it, we are all thinking it, its the wiggy sideburns... get some mutton on those chops.

expression is a little creepy to boot in the pic... but otherwise i see no problem other than a self confidence issue.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

I realize now that they were within their rights if they saw it in the car, but what about the fact that they were capped? I thought transportation of alcohol was legal above the age of 18.

DRAGONPIECEZ

what state are you in? all of them have different laws. But regardless its probably possesion by a minor. Just say it was your dad's booze or your dad's car... probably end up getting a plea for a $20 moving violation... basically less than a speeding ticket.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

just math, if you are good at math... you will be fine.

EDIT: but i got pidgeon holed into IT which i hate, i hate waking up in the middle of the night, hate always being on call.

imo, do something like electrical or mechanical engineering... just to avoid the BS, you will be happier imo.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]They came up with the Ryan budget which even majorities of Conservatives and Republicans don't support according to a new Gallup/CNN poll. But the problem is that we just switched from talking about the deficit to talking about jobs. What's the Republican plan for job creation? They passed the Medicare killing bill in the House and tried to get it through the Senate. They're obviously not opposed to pushing hard for something that they care about. Why not pass a jobs related bill in the House?airshocker

Medicare would still exist even after the Ryan budget went through, it would just be privatized for some folk.

The Republicans already put out their Pledge to America. I'm pretty sure that lists what their goals are, if you're really interested.

Less spending is always the better option, considering we see how well the stimulus did to stop unemployment from rising.

less spending is always a better option, but most importantly... lower taxes and less spending is a very simple message that resonates with every mouth breather out there. Thats why most republican states slash education spending.... dont want smart folk thinking about stuff, could be dangerous.

Americas hat, the good ole canada, mauls us in so many indices its embarassing. Free market is hot **** but a single solution never solves all problems.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"] new law: instead of drug checks for welfare eligability, how about employment checks for voting eligibility?comp_atkins

makes sense... that way our representatives can increase the unemployment rate to whatever they want without fear of losing an election. This sounds like a very logical and intelligent idea.

btw what language do you code in and where do you work? pretty sure i could write your code at 50% off.

vhdl primarily and i'm not telling.. find your own job :P

well thats not very free market of you...

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

Would lowering the retirement age help at all? Let some of the older folks retire now, which would create more room on the bottom as people in the middle get promoted?

YellowOneKinobi

You cant lower the retirement age... the talk is of increasing the retirment age. To lower the retirement age your would need tax revenues... which americans cant afford.... especially the top 1% they need those tax breaks just to put food on the table. The highest tax bracket is really suffering right now... only able the buy the new porsche model every other year... feeding their dog cheap beluga caviar as opposed to the good stuff. They are really suffering during this downturn.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

So it's showing not as much correlation as was believed, but, he even says, not enough to disprove the notion.

High unemployment should affect a sitting President. And that's going to be the number one issue this election.

comp_atkins

I agree. Unemployment is going to be a key issue going into this upcoming election. But I don't think there is a hard and fast line of demarcation number you can put in the sand and say, "Above this number, and the country elects a Republican. Below it and they reelect Obama." Other factors involved. Who the Republicans send up. How much the country blames Republicans vs. Democrats. How big of an issue Medicare is. etc. I actually think Republicans taking over the House and removing the filibuster proof majority in the Senate helps Obama's reelection chances. Before, you could make the argument that the Dems had control over everything so if something wasn't fixed you could point at them. Wasn't entirely true with Republicans enforcing a full 60 votes on everything in the Senate, but you could at least make the argument. Now though, with Republicans controlling the House, that's a harder argument to make. If I was a conservative I'd be very concerned that the Republican House hasn't pushed at least a token measure towards job creation since they took over. What are they going to be able to point to and say, "See? We tried to fix the job thing but the Democrats wouldn't let us!"

new law: instead of drug checks for welfare eligability, how about employment checks for voting eligibility?

makes sense... that way our representatives can increase the unemployment rate to whatever they want without fear of losing an election. This sounds like a very logical and intelligent idea.

btw what language do you code in and where do you work? pretty sure i could write your code at 50% off.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] such is life when you are no longer needed

YellowOneKinobi

Indeed, though I suspect that Kinobi is referring to our socialist views and arguments and not the ultimate end conclusion we came up with.

I was referring to the whole "everyone moves down a peg" situation we're in. I eluded to that in a previous post about seeingadults workingin places like McDonalds, supermarkets and entry-levelwhite colar jobsbecause thats all they can find at the moment.....and how that makes it so much more difficult for people just starting out.

But its cool cuz paul ryan has their retirement planned out.... so as crappy as their job is they know they have nothing to look forward to. Its the american dream.... work for minimum wage until you die. Greatest country in the world my friends.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

depends how stupid the public is imo. If they are smart enough to realize this recession started before obama, hes in the clear. But there is a reason GOP has cut education.

airshocker

It doesn't matter when it started. What does matter is what the sitting President has done to fix it.

A double-dip recession would be completely Obama's fault, though. And it looks like we're seeing it.

what would you have done to fix it? trickle down?

or are you making a comment on how stupid the denizens of this country are? That they cant understand handing someone a turd and getting angry because its not a diamond 2 years later?