I was partying hard, got slapped and missed my exam! crazy good times!
SquirrelTamer's forum posts
[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"]
How is that a warcrime? That's not even war
grape_of_wrath
It's a land under belligerent occupation. Under the 4th Geneva convention- settlements of citizens belonging to the occupier are in violation of the convention.
Israel disputes the obligatory status of that clause. /and then I was the BBC
That's not what the 4th geneva convention says thoughYou have been asked to show a single law Israel breakes and you have been unable too. This is just typical anti-semitic rabbling. Accusing Israel about stuff you know nothing about just because it's Israel.[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
Or what about, lets not support Israel when they are in fact committing war crimes and breaking international law for the past few decades?
sSubZerOo
.. Wow really? The continued settlements within the West Bank?
How is that a warcrime? That's not even war
allowed/condoned slaughtering of a Palestinian refugee camp within Lebenon both during the Lebenon Civil war..
It's not that I liked it but how is this a warcrime? Being silent isn't a warcrime is it? The crime was perpetuated by the phalangists. How many times in history has warcrimes been condoned? As we speak this happens by every country in the world.
The continued blockade of all humanitarian supplies to the Gaza strip..
All humanatarian supplies? Even the ones that Israel supply to Gaza on a daily basis? lol. And a blockade is not illegal at all.
The 1967 war which had Israel attack Syria, Jordan (two countires that were not involved with the Egyptian blockade) and Egypt.
Wow nice try with historical knowledge there. Israel was actually attacked by Syria and Jordan and Israel's "attack" against Egypt was pre-emptive in response to, like you mentioned, blockade, expulsion of sinai forces, threaths and amassing of troops. It's funny how Israel's blockade is a "warcrime" but not Egypt's.
They then held the country and purposely held off peace treaty to try to take as much land in all three countires they occupied..
Yeah the Khartoum summit had nothing to do with that :lol:
Furthermore how the hell is this anti semetic, you do know there Jews extremely critical towards israeli government right? I suppose they must be self hating Jews like Noam Chomsky..
Yes I guess just cause you're a Jew excempts you from being anti-semitic. Like Bobby Fisher? Look that guy up and tell me Jews can't be anti-semitic. And as I said it isn't the critique itself. I am also critical of Israel sometimes.
No where have I ever tried tod efend the extremist organizations of the PLO or any of the dictatorships in that region EVER.. Its mind boggling that all of a sudden I am crazy anti-semetic when I am critical towards Israeli policy when the country government that is suppose to represent me, the United States, is unquestioningly supporting Israel..
Supporting dictatorships isn't the same as being anti-semitic but whatever. What do you mean with unquestioning support?
The only thing I support is to stop unquestioningly ANY side of this conflict.. If you read any historical writing on this region for the past 100 years you will see something that completely contradicts your views.. And this is coming from someone who didn't knew USA gives aid to the PA that Jordan and Syria directly attacked Israel first in the six-day war. And that's just limited to two comments from you.
Its a FUBAR situation, and neither government/organization should be unquestioningly supported.. Thats it.. Period.. I am not against Jews (seeing as I am Agnostic Atheist to begin with)
What's makes me think you're against Jews is that you come here time and time again saying stuff, get proven wrong and then leaves. Then you start the process over and over and over again. But we never get anything new from you. Why are you this obsessed with Israel but still obviously have no knowledge about this?
I am not against the Israeli people.. I am against the hardline government policies that the Israeli government has perpetuated for decades.. But then agian why should I even bother telling this to some one who honestly thinks that oen side is completely innocent in the 70 years of conflict..
That's like saying we shouldn't have supported the allies during WWII cause "no side is innocent".
If you actually read history
:lol:
No I didn't say so either. But when the critique is based upon absolutely nothing it makes me suspect the critique has more to do with Israel being Israel. Why would you say Israel commits war crimes when you can't name one?[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Criticizing Israel isn't anti-semitism, and throwing that term around so lightly cheapens it.
worlock77
There's a huge leap from possibly being misinformed to being anti-semetic.
I don't think so. At least not someone who is so determined and comes for EVERY Israel thread with factual errors, then gets proven wrong and then returns to do the same thing again.Sometimes the U.S. and Israel relationship, strikes me as the hardworking husband who puts up with his very abusive wife in hopes she might love him one day. And despite all of his friends telling him to dump her and that her antics hurt him, he still keeps going thinking one day she might change.m25105Yup US really has Israel in a leash.
You have been asked to show a single law Israel breakes and you have been unable too. This is just typical anti-semitic rabbling. Accusing Israel about stuff you know nothing about just because it's Israel.[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
Or what about, lets not support Israel when they are in fact committing war crimes and breaking international law for the past few decades?
worlock77
Criticizing Israel isn't anti-semitism, and throwing that term around so lightly cheapens it.
No I didn't say so either. But when the critique is based upon absolutely nothing it makes me suspect the critique has more to do with Israel being Israel. Why would you say Israel commits war crimes when you can't name one?[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"] Now tell me about the huge cities in Dark Souls that I heard so much about but never seenloosingENDS
You have to play it, i dont want to spoil it for you
:roll:
Are you talking about Anor Londo? You know that city where you can actually play in only a fractionof it?? Demon's Souls got it to. In 2-2 you see a huge city and if I am not mistaken 3-2 is also a city (although in ruins). So demon's souls 2X as much huge cities.
[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"]
[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]
Actually Demons Souls had one castle in chap1 and a ruined one in chap4, both of which dont touch Dark Souls castles artistically imo
And then was mainly caves like chap 2 and dark areas like chap 3 and 5
while Dark Souls aside form having a far better castle design, also has far more unique themed areas like forests, huge cities etc
And the Dark Souls castle is not crap, it is much better than anything in Demons Souls actually
First of all they take a crap on Dark Souls castles. Second of all chap 4 was really a shrine and not a castle but yeah sure. It then turned to beautiful caves.
chap 2 was a mine so obviously and you went deeper and deeper. "Dark areas" so what?? That's the beauty of it? Dark Souls is a happy place without atmosphere. chap 3 was a prison btw and 3-2 was a beautiful ruined city and swamp area. 5-1 was a really cool place as well. A cool valley.
Yes firests are certainly unique. And what huge cities? I didn't see any huge cities?
No it's just crap. No atmosphere. Like something from tellietubbies.
As i said, you may like it best, i like Dark Souls art, design, variety, places and atmosphere 10x more than Demon Souls
I dont recall a single area in Demon Souls that i like as much as Dark Souls TBH, they were all inferior
Now tell me about the huge cities in Dark Souls that I heard so much about but never seen
Log in to comment