SquirrelTamer's forum posts

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"] Dark Souls = a castle (crappy castle compared to boletarian palace) within a castle within a castle within a fortress. Then there's a little forest and another castle. That's pretty much it. If you think Demon's souls was just caves you obviously haven't played it. And no it's not near as dark and with the same solitude as Demon's Souls. Actually on MC they have the same score. Which is quiete amazing consider the crappiness of Dark Souls compared to Demon's Souls.loosingENDS

Actually Demons Souls had one castle in chap1 and a ruined one in chap4, both of which dont touch Dark Souls castles artistically imo

And then was mainly caves like chap 2 and dark areas like chap 3 and 5

while Dark Souls aside form having a far better castle design, also has far more unique themed areas like forests, huge cities etc

And the Dark Souls castle is not crap, it is much better than anything in Demons Souls actually

They're nice, just not as nice as Demon's Souls. And they said it was ope world and you can go to any place you can see. Turns out it was just a big lie, it's not more open world than Demon's Souls.SquirrelTamer

Well, your opinion

I like them 10x better than Demons Souls myself, because of the far better varity, art and design

Dark Souls has dark areas, castles and caves that Demons Souls has, but Demon Souls is missing the forests, lakes, huge cities etc of Dark Souls

Also it is indeed a vastly more open and non linear world than Demons Souls, you have probably not played it yet i suppose

Demon's souls has just as "huge cities" as Dark Souls. And it also has prison, shrine (a real one) and a mine. And it does have swamp lakes. So only thing missing is a big ugly forrest. No it's not more open or non-linear. Only difference is that you can travel between the worlds in more ways. Leading to the world looking really crappy since it feels like they just bunched 5 big castles and a big city together
Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Actually the biggest thing improved for me in Dark Souls is art and atmosphere, it is so much closer to what i like than Demons Souls that there is not even a contest

Aslo the variety in art and areas is night and day better in Dark Souls, from huge forests to huge cities and is not just caves, the same looking castles and darkness of Demons Souls

It is vastly better than Demon Souls in every way imo, that is why it got a 9.5/10 too with far highest standards than the 9.0/10 Demons Souls back then

loosingENDS

Dark Souls = a castle (crappy castle compared to boletarian palace) within a castle within a castle within a fortress. Then there's a little forest and another castle. That's pretty much it. If you think Demon's souls was just caves you obviously haven't played it. And no it's not near as dark and with the same solitude as Demon's Souls. Actually on MC they have the same score. Which is quiete amazing consider the crappiness of Dark Souls compared to Demon's Souls.

Actually Demons Souls had one castle in chap1 and a ruined one in chap4, both of which dont touch Dark Souls castles artistically imo

And then was mainly caves like chap 2 and dark areas like chap 3 and 5

while Dark Souls aside form having a far better castle design, also has far more unique themed areas like forests, huge cities etc

And the Dark Souls castle is not crap, it is much better than anything in Demons Souls actually

First of all they take a crap on Dark Souls castles. Second of all chap 4 was really a shrine and not a castle but yeah sure. It then turned to beautiful caves.

chap 2 was a mine so obviously and you went deeper and deeper. "Dark areas" so what?? That's the beauty of it? Dark Souls is a happy place without atmosphere. chap 3 was a prison btw and 3-2 was a beautiful ruined city and swamp area. 5-1 was a really cool place as well. A cool valley.

Yes firests are certainly unique. And what huge cities? I didn't see any huge cities?

No it's just crap. No atmosphere. Like something from tellietubbies.

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"]

[QUOTE="sircyrus"]

Much of the world would disagree you with on the settlements not being illegal. Even the Israeli laws consider them illegal, hence why Netanyahu announced 2 weeks ago that they're going to look into finding a way to legalize the settlement outposts.

And if Israel said they'd freeze their settlement construction, why did they announce new settlement construction more than once in recent months? The peace talks were derailed 2 years ago when the week before the talks were supposed to begin, Israel announced new settlement construction knowing full well that the Palestinians would be ticked off. They intentionally sabotaged the talks before they even started, and are preventing them from being able to come back to the table.

In regards to the attacks, I think you're confusing the PA with Hamas.

And as the leaked negotiation documents showed, it isn't the PA who is being uncooperative and unwilling to negotiate. Quite the opposite. Even the US is criticizing Israel for it's settlements derailing the peace process.

mayceV

I don't care what the world dissagree with. Israeli law consider some outposts illegal not all the settlements as a whole.

No if you read what I said they would freeze them with natural growth if the PA would agree to negotiate and without natural growth in exchange for recognition. Lol Israel is "preventing" them from coming back? At the UN a few weeks ago Netanyahu just said they're in the same country, city and house why can't you come and negotiate? Maybe it was secret mossad squirrels stopping him with their infamous insidiousness.

I didn't say it was the PA. But Hamas is suppose to represent the palestinians so they shouldn't be that easily neglected.

"even the US"? So what what's that got to do with anything? They critizise Israel alot. so what? And leaked documents show nothing. And what relevance though they have now with Abbas avoiding talks more than death?

lol, you do realize the Isreali Government accounts for only 18% of settlement building right? freezing 18% is less that 1/5th of the "natural growth" so that freeze was hogwash and ment nothing. So yes it may not be Natenyahu himself that needs to stoop but also the settler movement. So in reality it wasn't a full freeze just one where the GOVERNMENT would stop any GOVERNMENT DRIVEN building projects and Natural growth in Government built and run settlements. You can't even fall back on that card buddy.

You have proof of this? That Israel would only stop building in government driven building projects?

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

The Palestinians are not supported by the United States, never were.

What money is that? The US does not gave Palestinians any form of money what so ever.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/obama-administration-u-s-aid-to-palestinian-authority-critical-to-mideast-stability-1.372877

Nice try though although your ignorance shouldn't come as a surprise. For thelike 458th time this year you are factually wrong.

Drawing baseless accusations.. Israel is as much the aggressor as they are the victim.. There is no "just" side.. The United States should not be supporting either leadership unquestioningly..

Except they pretty much never ever been the agressor.

Where did I say that? Oh thats right no where.. I just think that the United States should not unquestioningably support Israel, especially when they have committed war crimes, human rights violations and the like..

Again you haven't showed anything to support this. At all.

Thanks for the great laugh.

I don't find this funny at all. Anti-semitism and ignorance in general is nothing to laugh about.

sSubZerOo

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] i am for cutting all gifts too other countries.sSubZerOo

that I can respect, at least its not the "lets hurt Israel because its Israel" type of argument I occasionally hear.

Or what about, lets not support Israel when they are in fact committing war crimes and breaking international law for the past few decades?

You have been asked to show a single law Israel breakes and you have been unable too. This is just typical anti-semitic rabbling. Accusing Israel about stuff you know nothing about just because it's Israel.
Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] The funding was withdrawn from UNESCO not Israel.Ace6301
Im aware of that

Then why bring it up? If the US were to cut aid given to all foreign entities the amount would be fairly significant. That's the only case where the US would cut funding from Israel. Also every little bit helps. I'm sure the American tax payers would rather have their money go toward new bridges rather than Israeli tanks. Also you must be kidding if you think losing 5% of your national budget instantly wouldn't have adverse effects.

You realize the US gives way more to muslim states than to Israel. Like WAAAY more. Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt and even the PA gets money from US. Want to cut that too? And it's also way less than 5% of Israel's BNP.
Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"]"even the US"? So what what's that got to do with anything? They critizise Israel alot.sircyrus

Hardly. It's significant because even their strongest support is criticizing them and saying they are causing the delay.

And leaked documents show nothing. SquirrelTamer
If you believe that, than you haven't read the documents (which have had their authenticityy validated).

The US is neutral in this conflict. Probably the only neutral country. And they critize both Israel and the PA.

Show me the documents then. Though my point still is they have no use when they're not even willing to talk. You should read what Condoleeza Rice just revealed.

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts
[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Actually the biggest thing improved for me in Dark Souls is art and atmosphere, it is so much closer to what i like than Demons Souls that there is not even a contest

Aslo the variety in art and areas is night and day better in Dark Souls, from huge forests to huge cities and is not just caves, the same looking castles and darkness of Demons Souls

It is vastly better than Demon Souls in every way imo, that is why it got a 9.5/10 too with far highest standards than the 9.0/10 Demons Souls back then

Dark Souls = a castle (crappy castle compared to boletarian palace) within a castle within a castle within a fortress. Then there's a little forest and another castle. That's pretty much it. If you think Demon's souls was just caves you obviously haven't played it. And no it's not near as dark and with the same solitude as Demon's Souls. Actually on MC they have the same score. Which is quiete amazing consider the crappiness of Dark Souls compared to Demon's Souls.

Way to downplay Dark Souls environments. And you only mentioned a fraction of them...

They're nice, just not as nice as Demon's Souls. And they said it was ope world and you can go to any place you can see. Turns out it was just a big lie, it's not more open world than Demon's Souls.
Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]No, no it doesn't. If anything trying to cite 'oh this game is art, please shutup' only opens a window to more issues. It's about actually being involved in reasoning. SOTC is an excellent game, and a highly expressive one, but hardly a crown jewel in a good percentage of regards. GunSmith1_basic

yes it is

SOTC was the game that started "can games actually be art"

and its always brought up in debates

it is interesting that that game brings up the debate because it totally misses the point. Yes, SOTC is very "artsy", and it is art. But why can't a more pure video game like Tetris be considered art? I would argue it is much more substantial than SOTC

Of course it is. SOTC on the other hand is not unless you consider THIS art:

lol

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

we did it in Gaza, left completely, and yet there you go , rockets are still coming from Gaza, in fact they increased since Israel left manyfold.

there are organisations in the Palestinian society that frankly want me dead no matter what I give them , like Hamas or Islamic Jihad, and frankly they have more power on the ground than Fatah.

Darkman2007

And Fatah want you dead too. They're just not as honest as Hamas.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGNmHAcEE-s

here it is, a member of Fatah speaking on Al Jazeera, essentially admitting the goal is to destroy Israel, and that the peace process is just one step towards that goal.

if it wasn't for the rockets and threats like these, I would support the creation of a Palestinian state based on the fact that being there is an economic burden and the simple concept of "who needs them".

its also a matter of responsibility for them , being a state is both a privilage and a responsibility, and if they attack me as a state, its a different story as they can't cry occupation.

but I can't have peace with them , if they talk to me in 2 different voices.

They don't care about being a state. A very high ranking palestinian official even said as soon they'll get their "palestine" they'll be absorbed into Jordan. It's not about "palestine" it's an arabia on 100% of the arabian peninsula and north africa.