[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

This game isn't for you brezzy, its somewhat complex.

ebrezzy1

you mean we need this

the family friendly easy to play anyone can jump into to play dumbed down mouse controls made for easier gaming

So you believe that a device that is accurate enough to allow smooth gameplay based 100% on the palyer's actual skill and input is somehow easier and less hardcore than a controller based game that DOES THE AIMING FOR YOU? XD LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

You know what would fix intrusive DRM? MORE POWERFUL DRM!

NoodleFighter

[QUOTE="Stalkerfieldsis"]

[QUOTE="jackfruitchips"] 1.Because you're a dev and know for sure it coulnd't work on consoles :roll: 2. Typical elitist hermit comments.razgriz_101

1. The countless amounts of complex PC franchises dumbed down and genericized by being shoehorned onto consoles makes this a reasonable prediction.

2. Shove your pointless stereotypes up your ass.

and theres the fact your one of the most arrogant and butthurt hermits on here with a sense of self entitlement even Mitt Romney cant reach.

Stalker could work on consoles, with an optimized interface for the menu's on the console.Its not an exactly deep or complex game so don't kid yourself with some silly arguement.

If they wanted they easily could without dumbing it down despite your belief and various hermit belief.

The inventory system and amounto f control functions alone would have to be stripped down to work on consoles, your point? Not too mention the fact a game as complex as STALKER would sell horribly on consoles, the only way to get sales would be casual appeal.

I'd rather play Skyrim than the first STALKER, which comparatively is a far buggier game. This wouldn't be a bad thing at all. They're an experienced company with great assets to use. biggest_loser

They are also very different games.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

im being brutally honest i've played SoC and CoP, and lets be brutally honest how could they not work on consoles despiite various claims?

jackfruitchips

STALKER could never work on consoles, technical limitations aside, the game is to complicated for the average consolite.

1. The countless amounts of complex PC franchises dumbed down and genericized by being shoehorned onto consoles makes this a reasonable prediction.

2. Shove your pointless stereotypes up your ass.

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

And why would that not be possible if the game was singleplayer only park?

waltefmoney

Well that makes it sound a lot better.

Assuming that's the way Suvarium is handled of course.

I've always wanted to watch Stalker, but never got around to it.

Skrat just described Dayz in the best way possible, its basically STALKER with a larger, single, non-linear map, but the A-life AI is replaced by a player run experience like EVE.

Bethesda making STALKER?

The Witcher Enhanced Edition edges out Gothic 3 imo...Magescrew

But Gothic 3 is way less linear and has way more exploration. For me, those things are important in an RPG.

[QUOTE="Stalkerfieldsis"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] You said "why choose consoles when there is no reason to" - that means your argument is dependent on their being no reason to choose consoles. Clearly we console gamers have our reasons; else we wouldn't have consoles.lowe0

I've yet to hear one that can't be dismissed.

People trying to set the record straight are who you want to avoid? I'm sorry I'm keeping you from living in your own little bubble of denial.

[QUOTE="Stalkerfieldsis"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Your argument depends on there being no reason. lowe0

What?

I've yet to hear one that can't be dismissed.