@justthetip: I LOVE high frame rates in movies and shows, too! It's much more realistic and immersive! BUT, as Vojtass points out, you can't really compare movies and games in frame rates. I mean, you can, but the experience is different. So to ask if people that love 60+FPS in their games ALSO love smooth motion in their movies and shows is a little inaccurate.
@USDevilDog: I think it depends on what details are in those patents, and if they can hold up as wholly unique ideas. other form factors have put removable controllers flanking a tablet gaming system, for example, before the Switch was released. change the configuration of the buttons, add the shoulder buttons, etc. and it might be different enough to not be considered infringing on patents.
@justthetip: in this case, I believe the viewers over the critics. one critic (from EW) even admitted he only watched Episode 1 and 2, and 5, and quit. That's irresponsible! I'm curious though why you think it deserves bad reviews? I think it's quite brilliant.
@bdrtfm: the 3 main characters tell their story chronologically. almost nothing is told in reverse order, relative to that character. the exception is when Geralt has some flashbacks in his delirium, and those are pretty obvious.
I don't understand what is difficult to understand.
I wasn't that familiar with the material and I followed it just fine. When you break it down, each of the 3 main characters are in their own separate story arc, and those ARE in chronological order, relative to that character. by the 4th episode it should be really clear this is the case.
The only exception is when Geralt has some flashbacks in his delirium, but those are obviously flashbacks.
Tekarukite's comments