@dannydouble:

Heavy rumors indicate both Sony and Microsoft will reveal updated technology this E3. Either new consoles, slim versions of existing consoles, or separate plug-in-boxes, we're expecting some announcements in June.

It was either Black Panther or Black Widow that helped Cap rescue the others from the Raft. People forget that Natasha is really good at hacking. and she is probably on the run, too, Tony straight up told her that. It's funny how people forget that.

Let's not forget Agent 13. Sharon Carter can help Captain America, on the down low, and still hold her position at the CIA. Black Ops, right?

It was a little irresponsible for Tony to get Spider-Man on his side, him being so young and all, but think about it. If you're Iron man, and even if you disagree with Cap, you're still going to take the chance that he's not going to cross that line and kill anyone on your team. The only reason anyone even got hurt was ironically the Vision's fault. you know, the "there will be catastrophe" formula guy.

Back to Zemo. I don't think people are giving him enough credit. The UN is sitting on the Sokovia Accords. HE sends Crossbones to do some damage in Nigeria KNOWING that Cap's team is in a no-win situation. Sure you could say he was lucky that Wanda accidentally killed some people, but even if she didn't, the mercenaries would have, the world would have STILL blamed the Avengers, and the Accords get ratified.

Now anything the Avengers do without permission are illegal, BOOM, blow up the UN and blame Winter Soldier, KNOWING that Cap will break the rules and try to save his friend. Now Cap (and allies) are fugitives. This isn't luck, this is careful planning. Now all he has to do is lead them on a chase back to Russia where they THINK he is going to release the other Winter Soldiers, that's also planning, and then expose Tony to the info (that was set up years ago in other MCU movies, BTW) and Tony goes into a rage and tries to kill everyone.

Give Zemo credit. He's not lucky, he's methodical. He's ex-special forces. He's a mercenary. he doesn't care about collateral damage, if anything, he manipulates the public into further hating the Avengers. he can't lose.

From DICE a few days ago:

Julian Manolov, DICE Engineer, commented on the amount of CG in the trailer and demanded actual game play.: "3 and a half minutes of CG :) Anyone got a link which shows the game?"

Might want to look at the disclaimer on your own trailer, Julian: "Created with in game engine. NOT INDICATIVE OF ACTUAL GAMEPLAY."

DICE Trolls FTW.

@indigoj: "better" is relative. When I can't invite more than 4 of my friends to play, and even the 4 that do play get separated on to different teams, and server issues and lag and disconnection problems persist months after launch, I'd hardly call it "better." you might like the setting more, and the big maps and vehicles are fun and exciting to some, but the quality just isn't there.

@xMansie:

The populace has spoken? You mean the populace that continues to buy copies of Black Ops 3 even in March and make it the best seller 5 months in a row?

I'm with Marky360. I want to play seamless battles of ground warfare, hopping in my jet, getting into a dog fight, flying off into space, and blasting spaceships and then back to the ground again. With no load times. That sounds amazing!!

I'm going to get BF1, too, but I have a feeling all the exciting moments were edited into that trailer.

@fragwall:

Yup. As with BF3, the stuff they revealed in trailers and gameplay footage was the first 10-15 minutes of the game, which looked the best, and then it went downhill after that. At least BF4 wasn't nearly as awful and bug ridden as BF3.

@CheapMerc:

It is the game engine, yes, but even the disclaimer said "NOT INDICATIVE OF ACTUAL GAMEPLAY"

@killerious:

They do have the advantage, as does IW, of not even bothering with last gen consoles. I think that held everyone back.

as for Hardline, Visceral did that, not DICE, and it actually had a nice launch and still has an active player base.