I've not had a chance to play yet since the game is only out in the UK from Friday but four of the big problems from last year were that penalties were screwed, simulated stats weren't realistic, subs didn't works and sacks were too high. It seems that these issues have not been addressed once again this year, which is really disappointing. It's these little things that create the feel of authenticity. Oh well, at least it seems a small improvement over last year's offering. Oh for the days of competition in the marketplace....

Hmm, this doesn't look good. There's no sense of movement, it's feels like the ship is just spinning around on the spot.

Wow looks terrible these days. Really showing its age now.

Don't you remember how bad Fable 3 was?

I have to admit, after reading many of her reviews, I certainly won't miss them.

The game. Is clearly the best of its generation. The acting, cinematic style, tension and seamless transitions between action and dialogue are each the finest ever seen in a game. For that alone the game is worthy of a 10.

The price is irrelevant to the quality of the game and to the review.

Your final paragraph, aside from being nonsensical babble, reveals that you are far more interested in petty internet point scoring that contributing to the discussion.

8 out of 10 for an enhanced version of one of the best games ever made?

Yeah, sure - this is totally worthy of the same score as an unpatched Rome 2.

This site amazes me at times

https://www.idlethumbs.net/3ma/episodes/gaul-stones

Interesting and positive views on this game here

@Hurvl @Thathanka Failing to observe and report on the graphical and performance issues of a game that was practically in Alpha when released is not sharing an "opinion", it is straight up corruption.

And second?