[QUOTE="Archangel3371"]I loved it myself. Found the campaign very exciting and the multiplayer modes are terrific fun. Then there's the other extras like Forge and Theater. It was my overall GotY.Krystyan68
With all this negativity you wouldn't think that Reach was one of the most critically praised, commercially successful or highest profile online games of 2010!! :roll:
If you haters can't handle it, I suggest you go play Streetfighter.
PS: I think that Reach is the best in the series overall.
This "haters gonna hate" crap is basically an excuse to shut-down criticism. "Professional" critics are often blinded by hype, often dismissing or ignoring flaws that blatantly stick out. This is no more noticable for games like GTAIV, MGS4, and Modern Warfare 2. I gave up on them after 2007. Sales also don't exactly prove how good of a game is. But there have been a lot of reports of a lot of fans returning their copy of Halo: Reach, than they did with any prior Halo title. I guess that says something. I might as well play Street Fighter III, after all, it isn't unbalance and it doesn't contain any game breaking flaws either.PS: I firmly believe Reach is the weakest Bungie Halo game. It's good, but not great. Halo: CE had a better campaign (Despite it's repetitive interior level design), Halo 2 had MUCH better maps, Halo 3 had better balance, and Halo 3: ODST was more atmospheric than Reach. Hell, I can't believe I liked ODST's campaign more than Reach.
Log in to comment