--i do not think it is a matter of being "too good for TV" that is in the air here --but more of --too good for 'certain types' of tv --a movie franchise that has failed and the only place it can land is on tv? --i mean --MANY producers would die for such an opportunity --but --not real BIG producers --or BIG actors --'these sorts' need variety to keep any real career alive and going
--at this point --the franchise has failed --and --it was never really all that good to start with --she is young(youth burns off QUICK in the spotlight) --and she should believe in herself --that she can get what "she wants" --she has earned that right
--she has enough star power to land some solid HW blockbuster rolls --i mean --maybe not as the main star in all of them(try some supporting roles) --cause --all young actors that get early breaks --need to 'go through the ropes' of movie genres(and types of movies) --and try and find 'themselves' so they can be properly cast for the rest of the career
--if she just 'sticks with' this one franchise --when it runs out --most likely she will too --if i was her(based on how shit those movies are) --i would ditch the franchise as soon as possible
--the arithmetic average between 1-10 is 5.5 --though i must admit --i am not 'exactly sure' what yall are talking about --but --5.5 is "the arithmetic average" between 1-10
--but --this is another situation where you have a game --that is 40$ vs 60$ --that is being scored on the same par as a full priced AAA title --it is like(on the flip side) --when those little 20$ games come out --and get 10/10s
--it does seem --with it being a 40$ game --it should not have been 'held to the same standards' of a full AAA --and then --if the main negative about the game is bugs(that is fixable) --they may even be able to 'patch out' the long loading screens
--but it does appear the game is 'light on quality content' --but --it is like i am saying --is it 'short on things to do' for 40$?
--because --the 3 good things about the game --do not sound like things that a 6/10 game could possess
--about tourists --i felt the same way about San Francisco --i went in 2007 --i thought it was gonna be this magical city --of hippies and majestic 'mellow yellow american' originality --and even though it was(and it is an awesome city) --i was PRETTY let down --by how many tourist trap 'shops' there were --let me put it this way --when you go down to the waterfront(the street parallel with the bay) --9 out of 10 shops are rehashed tourist traps --and about 5-10 blocks up the hill(back towards the heart of city) --3 out of 5 shops are rehashed tourists trap shops --and --i mean it seems like the same person owns ALL the shops --and there are only 2 different ones --and they are EVERYWHERE --and they all sell the same exact stuff(ugly t-shirts~shot glasses~and repetative memorabilia) --and it is PRETTY ridiculous
--gotta fix those PS4 controller's thumbstick covers --those things are ridiculous trash --the triggers could be a little better design on both consoles --360 had the best trigger and bumper design --i am surprised xbox changed them COMPLETELY for xb1
@siarhei: --oh i aint hating --it(neo) just isnt quite as impressive as sony led on --seeing as how scorpio is baically a mytholoical console of the gods --and playstation came out and said Neo was supposed to be 'on par' with scorpio
TheZeroPercent's comments