[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]

This guy is crazy, but FEMALE contreception should not be coverved by healthcare.

Blue-Sky

[Fixed]

Good to know as a man, there' s no controversy over viagra, Vasectomies, or any male contraception already being covered by insurance.

No contraception should be covered. Period. Sex is not an unalienable right.

($100 per employee per day)...and guess what fining organizations $365,000 per employee per year...

whipassmt

Math was a bit off there. It's $36,500 per year

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]

worst sandwhich...Wendy's?

ghoklebutter

Don't you dare ;[

So Wendy's is good? frankly I'm tired of talking about gay rights so lets change the topic of this thread to the best fast food.

Of the 6 or 7 times I've gone to Chick-fil-A, I've only ever had one decent chicken sandwich. Now, when I say decent, I really mean it was somewhere between McDonalds' and Wendy's chicken sandwiches. The rest of the time Chick-fil-A served mean overcooked, greasy mess that had absolutely no redeeming qualities. Thus, I encourage everyone to boycott this terrible business for serving terrible food.

I really don't have the energy to care about the politics of Chick-fil-A's owner. He can spend his money however he wants; no one is forcing a person to eat there. Now, to actively interfere with someone's business with something like a "kiss-in", that's a completely different matter, which I strongly discourage. The GLBT community should find a better way to protest and share their message.

megam

So which one's the worst sandwhich, McDonalds or Wendy's? i honestly don't know

It's very likely with Israel ready to start something any time now.

Lord_Omikron666

Hopefully we'll come to our senses and stop encouraging Israel. The moment they think that they can drag the US into a war with Iran, they'll take it.

All the GOP canidates that might have done something so stupid are now gone, so.. no. At least not for the next 4 years.

No I don't think it was an easy fight. The movie was rather lengthy.....it would have been silly to increase the fight time.LJS9502_basic

Yea, overlong fights tend to be annoying. Anyway, when Bane's mask was damaged and he started to go apesh*t, that pretty much made the whole movie. Awsome sequence.

What do you guys think of the final fight between Batman and Bane? Do you think Batman defeated him a bit too easily, even when you disregard the fact that he targeted Bane's mask? It seems as though Batman was stronger than he was in their first fight (not as strong as Bane but strong enough to hold his own against him). Also, did anyone find it funny when Bane began snarling and going crazy after Batman damaged his mask? Why was Bane as strong as he was; despite the lack of Venom in the film, he was strong enough to punch a hole into a cement column. Finally, what was the source of the gas channelling through Bane's mask; there were no gas canistors.BluRayHiDef

I think a major theme was strength through determination and willpower rather than fighting ability. Remember when Lucius showed that footage of Bane wrecking the sh*t out of that security checkpoint and said that he fought so well because he was just so determined and beleived in what he was fighting for? I think that batman's time in the prison essentially gave him Bane's source of power. Just my theory

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Uh why was it cheap? He was going to kill Batman with nothing so spectacular.:?

LJS9502_basic

I get what you're saying; I too much prefer the (dare I say) realistic deaths that just happen, no buildup, no dramatic crap, but in this instance it was just over way too quickly. They had moved on to the next scene before you even processed what just happened.

Was anyone else a bit put off by how Bane was reduced to little more than a pawn? Not to mention that his death (presumed) was not that interesting? I mean, I thought he was one of the most badass villains in recent memory, almost matching Heath Ledger's Joker, and that's what they do to him?