[QUOTE="XBOunity"]
[QUOTE="lockjaw333"]
Well I admittedly can't comprehend most of the technical jargon, but big picture it seems kind of Funny. So they sacrificed GPU power to have some amazing audio chip and spend untold money on tweaking the DDR3 memory and EsRAM pool to try to make up for bandwidth limitations, while also adding Kinect. In order to keep the price reasonable then, they cut back on the GPU.
Â
For a device that primarily plays video games, that is an extremely curious decision. They should have just scrapped all that crap and went for the most powerful GPU they could get in the box and still make it affordable, because at the end of the day the PS4 is just plain better hardware wise. Not to mention Sony probably spent so much less on R&D that it evens out losses they will take selling at $399.
Â
Really no great news here.
lockjaw333
games are just as good on xbox one and the graphics are comparible, everything else blows away PS4 hardware wise. sorry bro, you are getting cheaper with the ps4, you get what you pay for. You want the best, get the XBO, simple as that, or go the budget route and the get ps4 with a ton of indies.
Â
I didn't make any comment on which system I would get, just that it seems like they cut back on GPU power to include other things in the box. Favoring audio over GPU power is a stupid decision for a games console, and you are getting all excited about it trying to claim ownage for something no one really cares about.
I really wanted to see something better than the rumored 1.3 TFLOPS GPU, but they confirmed it in those slides. That to me is disappointing, I can't believe they spent that much on R&D to end up with a mid-range AMD 7770 card, in a box that's retailing for $500.
And for the record I'm disapointed in both systems power wise. Why the f*ck are we still seeing 720p and locked 30fps games...what was the point of the next-gen upgrade then?!
Well said.
Log in to comment