@lonesamurai00: Don´t mistake PS gamesrs with some people who have problems/doubts with their sexuality...

@sparent180: "It's a big part of what made the first game so great."

Really? I never felt in doubt about who's the good guys were in TLOU...

@videogameninja: I was going to make a comment... You stole the need of doing it... Great comment...

@hardwenzen: Same thing with stupidity...

Well... I'm on board as always. I been waiting too long for this game. The first game was awesome not because of the story (take a person from point A to point B), but because of the presentation, acting, sound and direction.

Also I have no problem with gender choices, colour of skin or any other bulshit. So my review will be made based on the quality of the game. To all these "not buying, I don't want political agendas", don´t worry, we tell you later if the game is good or not...

Good... People who distrust of Naughty Dog at these point are a no needed audience...

That's life Naughty... You can do an amazing work, have great standards... yet... Have always a bunch of morons giving upfront reviews without even played the game yet...

@Vojtass: "games contradict books in quite a few places."

And that's why I said I prefer CDPR vision...

@Vojtass: Well, CDPR did not made a linear story. To be truthful, the main story is linear but all the side plots are optional... It´s not the same style of writing.

I personally don't like the books, and even the characters are meh to me...

I guess is a matter of taste. In story terms TW2 is still my favourite. That´s the thing, TW1 is different from TW2 that is different from TW3. But I like all games, that´s why I prefer CDPR in total control of the characters and story.

@Vojtass: I prefer CDPR writing style. Let's just say that Sapkowski doesn´t like CDPR view of TW universe... I respect his view because there would be no Witcher universe without him but... I prefer the world CDPR gave us...