@stuff238 said:
No for many reasons:
8. Nintendo’s lack of store. Not being able to push DLC and such. 3rd parties want money.
They want money, so lets ignore this fast growing, potentially huge user base? But i'll admit, nintendo's store front sucks, especially their "sales", if i can even call them that. Nintendo is different.
@stuff238 said:
No for many reasons:
1. Online sucks on switch. That means NO shooters(cod/BF/destiny/star wars etc) or games like gta/rdr. Sports games.
Multiplayer titles so far like kart, and splatoon work good. co-ordinated events like splat fest or whatever they do with splatoon go off without problems. who knows what the paid service will be like and what new features will be there.
@stuff238 said:
No for many reasons:
4. Lack of space on switch. 32GB is a joke when most Multiplats are pushing 50+ GB.
Switch won't need 4k hi res textures and assests so they can get the size down some if they wanted to. I wonder if nintendo can release a larger capacity cartridge?
@stuff238 said:
No for many reasons:
6. Weak hardware. PS4/Xbone Version take priority. It is much harder to downgrade games than it is to upgrade. This creates massive headaches and adds costs.
7. Nintendo fanboys don’t buy 3rd party games. There is no market for them on Nintendo’s system. They only want Nintendo’s games or weird Japanese kiddy games like “Zack and wiki”.
re 6.: doom, skyrim, wolfinstein. besthesda at least seems on board. and capcom looks like their about to hop on the bandwagon as well. we'll have to see how skyrim sells. if it sells well you think EA won't consider bringing the next dragon age or mass effect? and same for bethesda with fallout. \
re 7.: true nintendo fanboys hate 3rd party games. but how much of the total user base are nintendo fanboys? also, maybe they hated them in a begrudging way. and had bad things to say because the devs ignored them and never released them on nintendo hardware. well maybe if they got the games they'd sing a different tune.
Log in to comment