[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

Most of the console gamers on this forum have never played a game on a gaming PC, so they don't know what theyre talkig about.

They're like deaf people making fun of music.

Kinthalis

Wow, that's downright insulting. Good job!

What's insulting? A metaphor describing an example of people putting down something they've never experienced?

Most of the people on this thread are tlaking about "pixel counting" as though a handful of pixels was really the only difference, which is ridiculous.

The question was about graphics, which can be appreciated as anything else in different ways. I think Okami looks better than almost anything else, and it was done on last-gen hardware. I don't think that the graphics are the best on PC, simply because that's not how I value graphics overall. I cherish good design over anything else.

[QUOTE="sami117"]

jrpgs have 0 depth

Bigboi500

He lost it a long time ago. And you have an avatar that proves his claim wrong too, score!

Most of the console gamers on this forum have never played a game on a gaming PC, so they don't know what theyre talkig about.

They're like deaf people making fun of music.

Kinthalis

Wow, that's downright insulting. Good job!

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="sami117"]

Rts doesnt even exist on consoles.......

sami117

And JRPGs aren't on PCs.

jrpgs have 0 depth.... no choices the witcher 2 will have by far the mst depth of any console game

And the generalizations continue. I can't stand most WRPGs, they annoy me greatly. Go play Disgaea 3 and tell me it has no depth.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

[QUOTE="sami117"]

but console games are usually by far the most shallow...

sami117

Really? I must be playing the wrong games, then.

Rts doesnt even exist on consoles.......

And JRPGs aren't on PCs.

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="sami117"]

my criteria is pretty smart funny tall

????????

Profit.

sami117

My criteria is smart, funny. Tall and pretty are added bonuses but not necessary or important. That's my point.

but is pretty better? (the ansewer is yes)

The girl that is not as pretty, but smarter, is better than the pretty girl that is not as smart. The point is that not every girl (game) is of equal intelligence. OK, this is starting to seem ridiculous.

[QUOTE="sami117"]

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"] And you just used the analogy that the prettier a girl is the more b**chy, and shallow they are, and used it as some sort of comparison between good looking PC games, and console games. So congrats on the generalizations.timmy00

but console games are usually by far the most shallow...

That's System Wars. Wait, no, that's a generalization as well... I'm confused.

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="sami117"]

i dont do that but games are like girls.... the prettier the better.

sami117

That's with the prerequisite that that person has brains to begin with. I don't care how pretty someone is, I'd never be with someone for her looks.

my criteria is pretty smart funny tall

????????

Profit.

My criteria is smart, funny. Tall and pretty are added bonuses but not necessary or important. That's my point.

[QUOTE="lostfan132"]

Im too busy having fun to care, analyze your AA, and textures quality all you want, we'll be over here actually playing games.

sami117

i dont do that but games are like girls.... the prettier the better.

That's with the prerequisite that that person has brains to begin with. I don't care how pretty someone is, I'd never be with someone for her looks.

If it'd be an option, I wouldn't worry. But I'll never support that model on its lonesome.