@cornbredx: I've tried to make the same argument for a long time now. A lot seem to think 'well you've got your money's worth by the time you can't play it anymore', which is a terriblely weak argument considering all the nastalgia gaming that's going on. I keep a lot of old games in stock because sometimes I just get the urge to revisit them, I don't ever want that taken away from me.
@darthrevenx: I loved the animated series and thought the live action show looked stupid as well. When I went back and watched it, I ended up loving it. Patrick Warburton nailed The Tick. I actually think the show was a little ahead of its time. If it were a show that started within the last 6 years, I think it would of had some success. PS, they changed the character names due to copyright bs on the live action show.
@packerfan7575: It is nice to see this, especially since I'll now be able to do more of this with my son. This game has just been collecting dust for some time in hopes they would do something like this.
I wonder if this has anything to do with the survey that came out not too long ago. I know I railed on it for it's lack of stuff to do offline and split-screen:
@_Silent_Jay_: Guess I never paid attention to that. I'm typically a skeptic and tend not to take too much at face value. I still do find it a little funny that the shadiest of organizations tells other people to be more open with information. I agree with all of you though, if someone pays you money to say good things about their product; people need to know that.
Hahaha, the US Government telling someone they need to be more open with information. Also claiming simply clicking a button to view sponsorship information does not suffice is a touch insulting. If you feel that a video is a little too positive, maybe you should do a little research. Ya know... Click the "more" button.
camverge's comments