dom2000's forum posts

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

I was once and it sucks! You are completely dehumanised and no one gives a damn about you....and they didnt even make any mistakes! I would shutter to think how I would have felt if they did mess up. Anyone else share this view?

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

Battle of the Dark Lords! Who wins?

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

With the slow movements and turning with a controller, i cant see how you would even notice the difference as long as the fps remained steady at 30.

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

Crysis 2 on supersoldier no doubt!

PAL360
The orginal is even easier!
Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

Yeah defonitly F.e.a.r 2, went and played f.e.a.r 1 afterwards thinking it was just me getting good at fps, but no, I got totally owned.

sailor232
Lol fear1 is simple too. Just use your slow motions...the guys dont stand a chance! Crysis 1 is also ridiculously easy if you have half a brain....
Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

[QUOTE="percech"]

Obviously consoles are holding back PC games(graphically anyway), the evidence is right in front of your face. People go out and spend a lot of money on upgrading for no good reason. Most PC games are multiplats, and they look quite identical to their console counterparts. Yeah sure, you get higher res, but really...with the tech available, games should look 10x better on pc. They don't. Not even PC exclusives look that much better than console exclusives. This is why it doesn't make sense to upgrade unless if you are just future proofing your PC.

You pay $300-400 on a new gpu, it will only be worth it when the next gen consoles hits store shelves. Which...evidently will cost about the same amount you payed for your new hardware in your pc a year before. PC games won't look as good as they should right now, until the newer consoles are out. One game(Crysis) isn't much to justify upgrading.

Lucianu

1. There are more high scoring PC exclusives than all consoles combined.

2. There are simple mods to add to multiplats to make them look 2 - 3 generations ahead that use PC hardware.

3. The difference betwen GTA IV (consoles) and GTA IV (PC)


That is NOT 2-3 generations! Come on...1 at the most. Dont be ridiculous. Your saying the difference between those screenshots is the same as the difference between and xbox360 and an N64...yea right!

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

? Its certainly not Crysis Wars...its really not that impressive maxed out! What do you think?

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts
I dont know...they make great games (didnt like farcry , but the Crysis 1 is one of the best games i have ever played) for sure but do some really stupid things eg no votekick in Crysis 2, no auto map downloader in Crysis 1 multiplayer, some of the worst cutscenes i have ever seen in Crysis Warhead... that come on...absolutely amateur mistakes. They are also, it seems, compulsive liars.... i really dont trust a word they say.
Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts
[QUOTE="dom2000"]

Its very sad that this hasnt been said yet....Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood!!!!! Great game and so underrated its not even funny. Fear 2 as well...tho hated by many for reasons i dont quite understand (sure it didnt have the same impact as the orginal but its still a great game with very fun gun fights) Chronicles of Riddick is just amazing as well...better than almost every game this gen imo! Half life 2 and the episodes are fantastic as well! And the orginal Crysis! The lack of great and innovative fps single player campaigns nowadays saddens me :( When is the last time one was released?

Dibdibdobdobo
Golden Eye has been a intresting game thus far. As lame as it seems i like how you have the main missions and side missions too. I've seen Call of Juarez, I assumed by the case it was a rip off of RDR lol.

I havent had the chance to check out Goldeneye but yea it looks good actually definitely need to pick it up. Lol well Call of Juarez came out b4 RDR so..... :P
Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts
Fallout 3/NW is Bioshock with more RPG elements and open world. But yea, no FPS's this gen beat the solo campaign of Bioshock.silversix_
Dont agree with that! Bioshock 2 i found to be much more fun...the additional combat elements really helped the game! Crysis is better as was Half Life 2 episode 2! Other than that tho....its saddening. 2004 had better single player fps's than this whole gen....with Doom 3 , Farcry, Half life 2, Painkiller and Chronicles of Riddick. All very different and very fun! Now its just cod clone after cod clone.