[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Which is more polished?

JordanizPro

I havent played Reach yet so my only reference is Youtube. I dont see a big difference anyway.

Which is more polished?

Now if only these damn gaming websites report this and expose these companies. I doubt any of them have the balls though.

BTW TC, can you link me to one of his threads on XBL or Epic? I want to see this and what people are saying.

The games and the graphics dont appeal to me AT ALL. I chose HD gaming over Mario.

It was pretty high until I learned it was $300. I hope it fails so Nintendo will learn to price things better.

I also think starting camera (when it goes 5-4-3-2-1-GO) and the replay camera looks terrible.

I agree 100% about the 3rd person view.

If youve played the Beta, you would know the graphics suck. MW2 looks better.

[QUOTE="mutenpika"][QUOTE="hkymike"]Microsoft shouldn't even be on this list. All they acer about is moneyTheSterls

Yea, the worst by far is Nintendo there the only company that sells there hardware for more then its worth at launch while the others take a massive loss. You just dont get any bang for your buck with them and this generation is the first time i have skipped there console.

Why wouldnt anyone sell their product for more than its worth. Its called profit. MS ans Sony had no choice.

[QUOTE="alexside1"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

so that means i'm forcing people to accept crysis as graphics king?

CaseyWegner

hermits didn't invent the term "console graphics king". it was done by people who recognized what the graphics king was and wanted a way around it.

And whats wrong with that? Everyone knows Crysis and PC beats all. Its pointless to included Crysis and PCs in the discussion so a sub-category was created. Console graphics king.