It's the physical traits that attract us to one another initially. So, it does bear some importance since you're only going to be physically attracted to certain people or things. Over time, as the relationship matures, we either become attracted to the more meaningful characteristics of a person... or we don't. It's at this point when we're faced with the decision of whether or not to continue the relationship. On the other hand, we meet people that we aren't physically attracted to but then we get to know them and become attracted to them because of who they are. So, if we're a part of a mature relationship that has deep roots that go beyond just the physical any type of physical change won't have that much of an effect on us. As for me, I hope that I would act as I've described above. I've never had to deal with that type of thing other than a little weight gain/loss. So, I can't speak from experience.Tell the truth. How much does a person's physical appearance affect your level of attraction to them? I'm talking about aspects of a person's appearance beyond their control, aspects unaffected by hygiene and overall good health, such as acne, baldness, scars, deformities, etc. For example, what if supermodel Kate Upton had severe acne but otherwise looked just as good as she does now? Would you still find her attractive? If not, what if the acne wasn't severe but was mild? Or what if she had fibromas, burn marks, or suffered from Alopecia? If you have a partner at the moment, what if they suffered some sort of accident that changed their appearance for the worse (God forbid)? Would you remain with them? Would the type of relationship affect your decision (marriage vs non-marital relationship)?
BluRayHiDef
jshaas' forum posts
This pic may be a bit exaggerated, but to me, there are enough people (+51%) that would understand where it's stemming from and say "Do Not Want!" You don't even have to be republican to see it imo, but wherever I turn, the people on the right seem to be a bit too confident that Mitt will win. They usually deflect and say Obama will lose the election because of the economy. But, the economy isn't even that bad. Who knows... Ron Paul might take the whole thing away from both of them. The fact that you think the economy "isn't even that bad" completes voids anything else you have to say on this matter. We're in our worst economic situation since the Great Depression. Over 8% unemployment... actually it's 10%+, gas is pushing $4 per gallon, decent paying jobs are very hard to find. The economy is awful right now. But, to answer your question... I saw prediction of the electoral map that has Romney/Ryan winning very big. According to the source this prediction hasn't been wrong since 1980. Make no mistake, the economy is THE issue here. Gay marriage, abortion, immigration, and whether or not you've really been raped doesn't matter. People want jobs... period. Unfortunately, yes. Romney is the nominee. Not voting for him, is a vote for Obama. Obama just needs to go. He's no good for us. Romney can be controlled easily by the majority rule in Congress. So, as long as Ried and his bunch get voted out of power we'll be in good shape.current rom campaign.
55% attacking a slightly misused pronoun.
20% hiding his taxes.
5% looking like an idiot overseas.
10% hiding his record on abortion, gun control and how he also said you didn't build that in a speech.
10% not having any answers to any questions about how he would run the country.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/18/1111399/-Mitt-Romney-says-entrepreneurs-need-government-to-start-businesses
seriously who is this guy?
this is the guy you are going to vote for?
just some generic republican?
he has zero platform but that does not seem to be a problem for you.
wtf america?
Riverwolf007
Log in to comment