[QUOTE="Cali3350"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] thanks, I made a few for friends and that were getting getting tired of their 360's RRoD'ing, When my brother's 360 died the 3rd time I talked to the UPS guy, and he told me they get 20-30 xbox's a week at that store. And I dont live in a hot area, so I believe the 30% RROD rate and the other 20% of other hardware failure rates.04dcarraher

I genuinely believe every single 360 made in the first two years of production will fail within the somewhat near future. Its a broken design that cannot sustain itself with directly modifying the console like you did. I still cant believe M$ released that.

I think the updated model at 2 years fixes it for well ventillated areas and the new one fixes it for good (minus random hardware failures).

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

Still waiting for you to acknowledge my post and explain how mlaa is "hacked msaa"

ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="yugioh3ds"]

yeah don't forget Halo Reach's dumb AI.....

Why would you hype the number of enemies on-screen in Halo Reach if the enemies are superiorly stupid?

worknow222

*sigh* Halo really isn't a graphics king. Its pretty, and good looking. Not bad by any means, but its not a leader like crysis, in terms of graphics.

Bardock47

I will never understand what all the fuss is over KZ2 graphics. They are not impressive at all. Goodness, it must be a preference thing because I just don't see it. As I've said before, KZ2 is a blurry, smudgy mess. Sorry but that vaseline look ain't doin' it for me. Not to mention it has some poor textures. But not only that I've noticed that in some areas it sports some low-poly structures in the environment. Graphically it really is weird-looking and is inconsistent. Okay for example...I can just look at UC2 and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that UC2 looks GOOD. When you look at KZ2 something looks off but again it must be a preference thing... The ONLY thing that I can say impresses me about KZ2 are the gun models. Beyond that however things start to get iffy.

So yeah to me Halo: Reach looks sharper and better in the graphics department. Not to mention all the stuff going on like number of enemies, friendlies, vehicles, A.I, etc.. and this game blows Killzone 2 out of the water. So to conclude yes to me Reach looks better than KZ2 and as a complete package KZ2 shouldn't even be mentioned compared to Halo: Reach. That is actually an insult to Bungie and all of the hard work they've thrown into the Halo series. Now graphics king? Not really ready to give it that title. Doesn't matter though because it still looks great.

T-razor1