I'll wait for the retail copy to be out before I decide, but I'm sure it will look excellent and play well.

I don't really care what GS scores Warhawk. It's quite clearly going to be a lot better than I thought it would be and is another reason for me to consider getting a PS3 in the near future to sit next to my 360 and Wii.

I hope that the PS3 starts getting some more decent games. More quality titles means more choice for us consumers.

[QUOTE="Fignewton50"][QUOTE="smooothe"]

My title states exactly what IGN does - they declare warhawk to be AAA in plain, to-the-point english. I listed it as basis for a discussion regarding the quality of warhawk, not as a spark to ignite what is AAA and what is not. AAA is a subjective term. Also, the scoring systems for these two sites are incompatible, so I know that it has not been declared as AAA on GS. I am simply outlining the fact that IGN thinks the game IS in fact, AAA material, even with the slightly below 9.0 overall score of 8.8.

Telling me to "get over myself". C'mon dude, if you're going to post, post something that adds to the discussion. Thank you!

smooothe

Dude, AAA is not subjective. It's a rating. A game can't be 8.8 and be AAA, even if IGN says so. If they said it was AAA, they had to have rated it over 9.0. Which they didn't, hence Warhawk is AA on IGN, even if they lied to you. Just because it's slightly lower than a 9.0, doesn't mean it can get away with being AAA.

Can you show me where it outlines AA, and AAA ratings objectively? If not, the terms are subjective.

When referring to a game as being 'AAA' on Gamespot, it must have a GS score of 9.0 or higher.

In this instance the TC is referring to a game as being 'AAA' with a non-GS score of '8.8'. This should not be referred to as AAA here regardless of whether the other review makes reference to the term AAA in their review. Kindly refer once again to my first sentence for the criteria to be able to refer to a game as being of AAA status on Gamespot.

[QUOTE="Burnout_Player0"]only gs counts here. read the stickies and stop making yourself look badSolidSnake35

Logical or not, it's the law here. On Gamespot only GS scores and official hype can be used when determining whether a game flops or not. End of debate.

btw i put the list up to prove there actually ARE games in develepment for PS3 and tha arguments of calling it the "delaystation 3" "PayStaytion 3" shud be put to rest in the nearby future. Sony are geniuses. u shud look at the bigger picture. the reason they arent releasing the full specs of the cell and all the games for it rite away is because they ARE actually preserving their well-vuilt system to last 8-10 years. while 360 has found its niche and the onli reason microsoft made the original xbox was so that their BELOVED PC gamers dont go astray nd alternate to PS2 instead of PC. not because they thought it wud be nice to invest in console gaming :Pmista_meth

I'm sorry dude, but "Paystation 3" and "Delaystation 3" are still fitting titles and are in no way proven false by a list of games in development that we have to wait for.

When will the waiting end Sony?

Bioshock is a definite contender for GOTY... whether you like it or not. I think that it's a gripping experience.

Blog it, no one cares here.Legendaryscmt

Exactly my point

jeez what a piece of crap . The game uses Unreal Engine but doesnt look as good as GEOW. The guns dont feel powerful, the music is awful , the sound effects are weak. The voices are bad, This whole thing just sucks.

I thought it was gonna be a Chinese Max Payne , boy was I wrong. Dont buy this crap .

Sonic_on_crack

Blah blah blah - that's your opinion. The demo was fun.