nnavidson's forum posts

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

nnavidson keeps posting OFFSCREEN PICTURES OF MULTIPLAYER FROM IGN LMFAO.

single player has better graphics, we are comparing single player vs single player.

FAILURE LOL

ps3rulezzggdff

You're comparing screenshots to video captures of images using motion blur...

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

I'm sorry... is this one multiplayer too?

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

Look how awesome those textures are!

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

You act like Gears had amazing textures at every turn...

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts
[QUOTE="Mizuke"]

Cheers for copy and pasting. :)

Aisenherz (who has strong ties with Guerrilla/suspected to be Phil) have said:

- Don't forget one thing: This game is PRE-pre-alpha! So, not PRE-Alpha, PRE-PRE! So, please don't start some "Hey, can you see that texture poppin' up! PLEASE, stop it, ok?
There will be much more details, effects and so on. Give us some time.

- Second: Half of the animations are still NOT in the game so, it will look MUCH MUCH better in the final game. Yes, we said it: The animations are matching the target render. Maybe it looks even better in the final game.

So you can reserve your judgement on the textures until it's closer to release, because they KNOW textures are bad at the moment.

ps3rulezzggdff

Here's a gears of war pre alpha wall texture shot much higher res

And here's the actual game:

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

Crysis>>>life>>>>COD4>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>KZ2

trust me the battles in COD4 are getting to be much more hectic than KZ2

desktopdefender

What are you basing that on?

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

[QUOTE="UKR_KIEV"]I honestly can't decide...... Xbox Live beats PSN. But PSN is free. I'm excited for KZ2, Lair and GT5 on PS3, but at the same time, I want to play Halo 3, Guitar Hero 3, and Forza 2.McCool69

You basically answer your own question since Halo 3, Guitar Hero 3 and Forza 2 all will be available in a couple of months (Forza 2 is already out).

Killzone 2 (which was recently presented as a pre-pre-alpha (!)) and GT5 probably won't be out for quite some time - probably late next year at best when it comes to GT5.

If you want a great selection of great games to play this autumn go for the 360.

Yeah... the games you want for: PS3 Lair will be out soon. Killzone 2 is next year. GTHD is free but you've have to wait until next year for GT5. Resistance would likely fill your Killzone void along with Haze and Unreal this year. Rachet and Clank, Heavenly Sword and Drakes Fortune are also set for this year.

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

I honestly can't decide...... Xbox Live beats PSN. But PSN is free. I'm excited for KZ2, Lair and GT5 on PS3, but at the same time, I want to play Halo 3, Guitar Hero 3, and Forza 2.

Graphics wise, It is starting to show that PS3 is more powerful (i.e. Killzone 2)

I think the clincher for PS3 may be Blu-Ray since HD-DVD is gunna flop.
Opinions please guys?UKR_KIEV

Guitar Hero 3 will be on the PS3 also. I'd also suggest if you go the 360 route you just go with the premium unless you plan ondownloading all sorts of hd movies.

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

Bluray,wifi, bluetooth, tilt controllers all things I dont freaking want. Honeslty if these features are soo amazing why arent more PS3s being sold I would like toknow...seems kind of like the majority of the public doesnt care about bluray or any of those of feel good features you guys brag about. And a better game line up than what? 360 and wii are getting very good games equal if not better than the few good games (killzone,mgs,ff,r&C) that PS3 is getting. PS3 a better choice lol if you are an audio/videophile

For $50 more you don't have to worry about your game crashing or getting three red lights.

Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

for anyone whining about the live fee for MS -- take a look at articles that show how much your PS3 costs to run each month in electricity bills.

clue: it's considerably more than the 360, and over a year it's way more than the cost of live.

one article stated that if you're running folding@home constantly your hydro bill will spike by over 7.30 USD$ per month. keep in mind this isn't indicative of gameplay - folding uses slightly less power than playing games.

3picuri3

1. You don't need to use folding home if you don't want to.

2. No one is going to be thinking about their electric bill when selecting a system for their family. They might think about online play though.