@KittenNipples

Don't be so paranoid, with Mists of Pandaria dropping soon the immature kids will have another home

@chilly-chill

ArenaNet is going to be the first company that has an original and a sequal killed by WOW

@chilly-chill

If you played WOW when it was fun (pre-Cataclysm) then yes it's similar. Even with its flaws TOR is better than WOW is now.

Which I know isn't saying much

@Brazucass

With 10 million people willing to throw $15/mo at recycled 8 year old content, would you?

@DevilD2005 @holtrocks

Unless your name is Warcraft

@Unfallen_Satan

Both TERA and TSW will probably follow suit. Frankly I find TOR to be better than the both of them and I can't imagine why anyone would justify $15/month for them now.

What it's going to boil down to is this: people are going to pay $15 for WOW and then decide what other F2P mmo they'll spend the rest of their time

Sad I know

@Daemoroth

In fairness Blizzard has done a good job letting the competition catch up. Neither Cataclysm nor the upcoming Mists offered/offers much in terms of new content. Just 5 levels and a few dozen quests in microscopic sized zones. A large share of their content has been recycled crap, and they already have the slowest patching schedule in the industry. When MoP drops in two months it will make almost a full year since Blizzard has made a content patch.

The tragedy here is that the genre needed TOR to be a success because Blizzard needs competition, they have grown lazy and stale and they've sucked the life out of MMO's

@strawberry9

Where does this origins myth come from? I've seen this same comment posted several times by different people (I think anyway). It's false

@wilson336

And now you know why WOW is still so successful

@roguebot

Cross server zones will only mean you have to compete with other players for mobs and resource nodes again. It will be annoying