rahzel54's forum posts

Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="Kimahriii"][QUOTE="kingtito"]

[QUOTE="nanomecha4"][QUOTE="bkslayer"][QUOTE="nanomecha4"]Before Xbox 360 sells 10 Million. Its February and 360 is at 9 Milllion. So id say by the end of the year 2007 PS3 will have 10 Million sold and 12 Milllion Shipped.kingtito

lol wtf.......... Im not a Xbox fan at all but...that was a little ignorant dont you think? Did you forget Halo 3 is due out between now and the end of the year....

Halo 3 aint coming out till 2008, unless they rush it.

Really and you work for Bungie???? Does anyone really know when it's coming out? Since we're on the topic tell me which games are going to sell the PS3? Don't go quoting the same old MG4, Motorstorm (racing games never sell a system unless it's GT), Lair ect....... Name some games that you KNOW fo sure will come out soon.

Right now the 360 and the Wii will outsell the PS3 for some time, at least till a price drop. Sony has proven that price DOES matter when it comes to the casual gamer.

System Wars is the other way, PS3 been selling great and infact has been selling better then 360 so no idea what your talking about. Wii is selling like crazy its cheap and different.

How is my post system wars material. I'm merely stating a fact the PS3 IS being out sold by BOTH the 360 and Wii. In no way shape or form have I said anything negative about the PS3.

I think you're reffering to Japan sales of the 360 if you're talking about the PS3 out selling. Where is really matters it's being out sold by 2 systems.

For the record the ONLY reason the PS3 has sold more in it's launch than the 360 is because of the shortage. You couldn't find a 360 for months after launch. You can easily go out today and get aPS3 at almost any store that sells systems. That's not a knock on Sony or the PS3, that's just fact. Sony did a great job of supply the only problem is the demand. It's not as high as everyone thought it was going to be. That's a direct result of the price tag. Once the price comes down to a reasonable number you'll see sales go up. Until then the 360 and Wii will continue to outsell the PS3 in NA.

thats not a fact for every location. seems like half of the stores in N/A (or at least quite a few cities) are still sold out, and most stores online are sold out as well. some of the bigger cities have stock and you could probably get a ps3 quite easily. thing is, sony has supplied FAR more stock than the 360 did in its launch. and even though it's only currently available in N/A and Japan, it has sold quite a few units already. also, imo, the 360 launch was slightly better (as far as available content). it was the ONLY system at the time that offered next gen graphics and was the ONLY next gen system available. there was also a slightly better library of games in their launch (imo). considering the ps3 has both systems to compete with and that resistance is arguably the only good game available right now, i'd say the ps3 is looking pretty good so far. don't get me wrong, all 3 systems are great, i'm just saying.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
id say by holiday season, maybe early 2008.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#3 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
its a good game. not amazing, but its good. resistance is the best FPS i've played since HL2, but before resistance, FEAR was the best FPS i've played since HL2.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
i REALLY hope they don't... i don't play games online a lot. sometimes i will for a while, but then i won't play for a very long time.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
Wow, thats an obvious drop in quality going by those screenshots.DressYouUp
too bad screenshots are a poor way to compare. i'd rather take IGN and GS's word for it (at this point).
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="jacjase"]

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

v-vega75
they have to save most of the game to the ps3 harddrive just to run it faster becaue of the disk space. look at the ps3 game genji yeah it sucked big time. but for the game to run faster and load time shorter the game has to be saved to the harddrive. this is not good cause it make the hard drive use up space for the games like this. and 360 is getting a dl to fix the problems in the game. so wait til march when ps3 version come out and the dl content for the 360 hit at the same time. then we will see which one is better. cough 360 version cough

the 360 version was cached to the HDD as well. the main thing that helped with the load times, was duplicating things multiple times on the blu-ray disc (this was also done on the 360 version, read the GS article).

no it wasn't cache to 360 harddrive only the downloadable content was so you failed

oh really? http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/10531/Oblivion-Fragmented-Cache-Data-Fix/ also, why do i "fail"? all my other points are valid. even if the 360 version DOESN'T cache files on the HDD, maybe it should, because the load times are slow from what i hear.

yeah the load time for the 360 is slow but with the update it will be faster thats why you failed.

LOL... why do i still fail? because all my points are valid? nice try to cover up, child.

the only child is you dude. i don't have to cover anyhing. to provove a point. just like in my post i put out a valid point and you overlooked it. ps3 version has ram problems. which dev have to pick and choose what they can put into the game. even if it is save to the cache to speed up load time they still had to dup the game to. the game is not duped on the 360 version because of space issue only the ps3 version is. because of more space on the blu-ray the game has too much space to read the data. make the load to longer. that why they have to dup the game. but i give you credit on the cache part because thats your only valid point. and only a child resort to name calling grow up

i'm a child? whatever... what you just said HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with my points. how did i overlook your points when i wasn't even talking to you in the first place? what does caching files to the HDD and duplicating things to the disc to improve load times have ANYTHING to do with your points? and again, i wasn't even talking to you in the first place. calling someone a child is not name calling. in this case, it's the truth. i think anyone here can clearly tell you're 16 at the oldest because of your poor grammar/spelling and lack of paragraphs. if anyone has to grow up, it's you.

first i called you a child. because calling me a child for what i post is name calling. i not 16 ( i wish i was) i am much older so get it right. and you were talking to me when you quoted my post.ask me my age before you start calling me a 16 year old. thats name calling an like i said. and dev said it before that they have to dup it to speed up load time look it up

they had to "dup" it to speed up load times? wtf is dup? if you mean duplicate things, then yes, they did have to duplicate things to speed up load times. they ALSO had to do this on the 360 version. whats your point? honestly man, give it up....you just can't admit you're wrong. i have no idea what you're arguing about. all i said is both the ps3 and 360 versions had to cache files to the HDD and duplicate files to the disc to improve load times... then you say how the 360 version does not cache files. i PROVED both of my points, then you say that the 360 does cache files and you say i still fail? lol... i'm done arguing with you... i have better things to do. you just can't admit i was right, and you were wrong.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="jacjase"]

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

v-vega75
they have to save most of the game to the ps3 harddrive just to run it faster becaue of the disk space. look at the ps3 game genji yeah it sucked big time. but for the game to run faster and load time shorter the game has to be saved to the harddrive. this is not good cause it make the hard drive use up space for the games like this. and 360 is getting a dl to fix the problems in the game. so wait til march when ps3 version come out and the dl content for the 360 hit at the same time. then we will see which one is better. cough 360 version cough

the 360 version was cached to the HDD as well. the main thing that helped with the load times, was duplicating things multiple times on the blu-ray disc (this was also done on the 360 version, read the GS article).

no it wasn't cache to 360 harddrive only the downloadable content was so you failed

oh really? http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/10531/Oblivion-Fragmented-Cache-Data-Fix/ also, why do i "fail"? all my other points are valid. even if the 360 version DOESN'T cache files on the HDD, maybe it should, because the load times are slow from what i hear.

yeah the load time for the 360 is slow but with the update it will be faster thats why you failed.

LOL... why do i still fail? because all my points are valid? nice try to cover up, child.

the only child is you dude. i don't have to cover anyhing. to provove a point. just like in my post i put out a valid point and you overlooked it. ps3 version has ram problems. which dev have to pick and choose what they can put into the game. even if it is save to the cache to speed up load time they still had to dup the game to. the game is not duped on the 360 version because of space issue only the ps3 version is. because of more space on the blu-ray the game has too much space to read the data. make the load to longer. that why they have to dup the game. but i give you credit on the cache part because thats your only valid point. and only a child resort to name calling grow up

i'm a child? whatever... what you just said HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with my points. how did i overlook your points when i wasn't even talking to you in the first place? what does caching files to the HDD and duplicating things to the disc to improve load times have ANYTHING to do with your points? and again, i wasn't even talking to you in the first place. i think you need to go back and read my posts again to get a clue... the ps3 version did not have space issues. 1up reported it have memory issues, and like you said before, who knows how the final product will turn out. well just have to wait and see. the reason the ps3, reported earlier by 1up, had loading issues, was because the read speed of the blu-ray drive was slightly slower than the 360's DVD drive, not because of all the extra data... the extra space HELPED with the load times. i did not ONCE say the 360 version was bad... ALL i said was that both the 360 and PS3 versions were made pretty much the same way, they both cache files to the HDD and duplicated files to the disc... thats ALL i said, yet you keep saying i "fail" for some reason. calling someone a child is not name calling. in this case, it's the truth. i think anyone here can clearly tell you're 16 at the oldest because of your poor grammar/spelling and lack of paragraphs. if anyone has to grow up, it's you.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="jacjase"]

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

v-vega75
they have to save most of the game to the ps3 harddrive just to run it faster becaue of the disk space. look at the ps3 game genji yeah it sucked big time. but for the game to run faster and load time shorter the game has to be saved to the harddrive. this is not good cause it make the hard drive use up space for the games like this. and 360 is getting a dl to fix the problems in the game. so wait til march when ps3 version come out and the dl content for the 360 hit at the same time. then we will see which one is better. cough 360 version cough

the 360 version was cached to the HDD as well. the main thing that helped with the load times, was duplicating things multiple times on the blu-ray disc (this was also done on the 360 version, read the GS article).

no it wasn't cache to 360 harddrive only the downloadable content was so you failed

oh really? http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/10531/Oblivion-Fragmented-Cache-Data-Fix/ also, why do i "fail"? all my other points are valid. even if the 360 version DOESN'T cache files on the HDD, maybe it should, because the load times are slow from what i hear.

yeah the load time for the 360 is slow but with the update it will be faster thats why you failed.

LOL... why do i still fail? because all my points are valid? nice try to cover up, child.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="v-vega75"][QUOTE="jacjase"]

umm the ps3s version has better textures and data can be cached to the hard drive unlike the 360 version so 256mb RAM is enough for ps3...512mb total if you count it all ah then theres the hard drive that each ps3 comes with standard allowing for devs to cache data to it unlike the 360

v-vega75
they have to save most of the game to the ps3 harddrive just to run it faster becaue of the disk space. look at the ps3 game genji yeah it sucked big time. but for the game to run faster and load time shorter the game has to be saved to the harddrive. this is not good cause it make the hard drive use up space for the games like this. and 360 is getting a dl to fix the problems in the game. so wait til march when ps3 version come out and the dl content for the 360 hit at the same time. then we will see which one is better. cough 360 version cough

the 360 version was cached to the HDD as well. the main thing that helped with the load times, was duplicating things multiple times on the blu-ray disc (this was also done on the 360 version, read the GS article).

no it wasn't cache to 360 harddrive only the downloadable content was so you failed

oh really? http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/10531/Oblivion-Fragmented-Cache-Data-Fix/ and as for duplicating things on the disc, again, read the GS hands-on article of oblivion on ps3. it says a similar technique was used for the 360 in duplicating files on the disc. also, why do i "fail"? all my other points are valid. even if the 360 version DOESN'T cache files on the HDD, maybe it should, because the load times are slow from what i hear.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="danneswegman"]strange.... i have to trust Gamespot and IGN when they say it looks better on PS3... but the screens look horrible... what's up with that? But it's likely the PS3 version looks better. i mean , come on.. it was a launch titel more then a year ago.. it should look better. If they were to make it for the 360 now, it would lok much better.

i doubt that, because it was a port to begin with (PC). it can only look so good... also, as i've said before, the ps3 needed more dev time simply because of the complexity of the hardware. but it will be easier to develop games for the ps3 once the dev tools mature.

better than 360. not better than PC.

i didn't say it was better than the PC. what i was saying is that the 360 version could not look much better than it is now because it was ported from the PC. the only way they could make oblivion look better, is making it from the ground up.