No word if this is real time or just CGI at this point.

I think you are right Nintendo has made their new console to revolutionaise the gaming world and with slighty better graphics than the Gamecube. The Sony and Microsoft have just made better graphics and I think they can not push the graphics much further. Nintendo was revolutionary with the NES, N64 and now the Wii.chocolate1325

Who cares my receiver can't do the true hd stuff. but boss sounds great already.rwbojorquez

[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="OceanLeet"][QUOTE="TriangleHard"][QUOTE="OceanLeet"]

[QUOTE="jwmakoto"]Going by the logic that things like having 4 controller ports are 'revolutionary', how is the PS1 using Disk-based media not revolutionary? Look what happened next.... no more cartridges :P
I'm partly kidding, but my point is saying that these changes in one system were 'revolutionary' and ignoring any changes other consoles made is well.... take your fanboy goggles off. The only one I'd consider 'revolutionary' is maybe the Wii, but it's a little early yet to see any future impact it will have on gaming.OceanLeet

I put the PS1 as neither because it wasn't a massive graphic upgrade nor was it overall revolutionary. Sure, it had discs, but so did the Saturn at about the same time. That alone isn't enough to attain revolutionary status. However, the PS1 was indeed a damn great console.

You forget the SNES had shoulders. How can the PS1 AND Saturn simultaneously be a single revolutionary console? lol. The idea of putting a cd drive in consoles was NOT new. The N64 may have lagged behind in that aspect, but it made up for it in others. Rumble, 4 player industry standard, 3D industry standard, Joystick industry standard....I would say the N64 was revolutionary.

That is debatable, but there was a dead period from 1983 until 1996 where no consoles had joysticks. The N64 brought them back and now all modern consoles have them.

[QUOTE="TriangleHard"][QUOTE="OceanLeet"]

[QUOTE="jwmakoto"]Going by the logic that things like having 4 controller ports are 'revolutionary', how is the PS1 using Disk-based media not revolutionary? Look what happened next.... no more cartridges :P
I'm partly kidding, but my point is saying that these changes in one system were 'revolutionary' and ignoring any changes other consoles made is well.... take your fanboy goggles off. The only one I'd consider 'revolutionary' is maybe the Wii, but it's a little early yet to see any future impact it will have on gaming.OceanLeet

I put the PS1 as neither because it wasn't a massive graphic upgrade nor was it overall revolutionary. Sure, it had discs, but so did the Saturn at about the same time. That alone isn't enough to attain revolutionary status. However, the PS1 was indeed a damn great console.

You forget the SNES had shoulders. How can the PS1 AND Saturn simultaneously be a single revolutionary console? lol. The idea of putting a cd drive in consoles was NOT new. The N64 may have lagged behind in that aspect, but it made up for it in others. Rumble, 4 player industry standard, 3D industry standard, Joystick industry standard....I would say the N64 was revolutionary.

[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

joeblak

most powerful? how do you figure?

???

Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360.

[QUOTE="ramey70"]What was revolutionary about the N64?Kook18

[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Ibacai

most powerful? how do you figure?