ramey70's forum posts

Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
Other than the release of TWO as-of-now exclusive games, Final Fantasy and Metal Gear Solid 4. The Europe lauch is, by all accounts, a massive failure. What is the next thing to start looking forward to? And I am not trying to flame here, I really want to know what the next major PS3 event is. Man, I am glad I bought my Wii and 360- I dodged a big bullet on that one. accameron
I disagree, I think are your intent is to flame.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
Gaming has been a loss to Sony as of late.  It is also a very low yield market and the costs are only rising.  The risk is high, as they are finding out with the PS3.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
Microsoft would never add a blu-ray drive to the 360. Maybe next gen, if blu-ray were to become the standard in the next 4-5 years.StephenKing_1
I don't think anyone is saying they are. An add-on drive is possible though.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="AvinashTyagi"]Blu-ray may have beaten HD-DVDbut Sony lostAvinashTyagi
How do you figure?

PS3 flopped, and Blu-ray won't replace Standard DVD's any time soon

I think Sony would happily trade a format win for a video game win. Blurays don't have to totally replace standard DVD's for Sony to make a sizeable fortune off the technology. If Bluray can create a niche HD market, which is entirely possible, they stand to really rake in royalty income.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts

[QUOTE="X_CAPCOM_X"]So? Microsoft would just pay Sony. They have money.DSgamer64

Yes but that could have an adverse effect on their consoles sales, if Sony was making money off Blu Ray from MS, then they could easily throw the money they get into the production costs of the PS3 and drop the price by a good chunk which would in turn sell more PS3's.

It would probably be offset by the royalties MS would get from studios encoding Blurays in MS's VC-1 codec.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
Blu-ray may have beaten HD-DVDbut Sony lostAvinashTyagi
How do you figure?
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="kingsfan_0333"]

Here is why I don't care:

Dvd's still own.

kingsfan_0333

Not on a 56" 1080p set they don't. In fact, over the air HD signals are much better than DVD.

How many people do you know that own 56" 1080 p telelvisions?

my point exactly.

Me for one.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
Depends on what you call a "win".   Most people think the writing is on the wall though.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="thinicer"]

Blu-Ray and HD DVD are both out of date.

Digital distribution via cable & sattelite TV is the future.

Ontain
Both are presently incapable of transmitting a 1080p signal with DTS-HD or DolbyTrueHD sound and will be for the near future. The bandwidth requirements are massive and even Verizon FiOS TV, which I have, couldn't do it and it's about a year old and very limited in availability.

you don't have to stream it. just have hard drive acting like a buffer. gig's are cheap these days. also who needs it to be the near future. it's going to takes several years for 1080p to be standard.

Buffering DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD with a HDD would impede the ability of either to provide pure lossless audio, especially when combining it with synchronized 1080p video.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="thinicer"]

Blu-Ray and HD DVD are both out of date.

Digital distribution via cable & sattelite TV is the future.

thinicer

Both are presently incapable of transmitting a 1080p signal with DTS-HD or DolbyTrueHD sound and will be for the near future. The bandwidth requirements are massive and even Verizon FiOS TV, which I have, couldn't do it and it's about a year old and very limited in availability.

That's going to change. Analog is going to be eliminated come 2009, freeing up lots of bandwidth. Not only that, but bandwidth savings will also be realized because of IPTV - the only channels that will stream to a TV will be what the user wants. If I want CNN, HBO and Showtime only, those will be the only channels delivered and streamed. That's a big function of IPTV, to tailor your TV experience and cut out all the noise you don't care about, like for instance....I never watch Lifetime, so why should it be streamed to me?

You misunderstood me. Verizon FiOS is a pure Fiber Optic transmission technology all the way from the source to the house. This allows for massive residential 30Mbps internets speeds and pristine HD signals. Even with that fiber optic, and yes digital, signal, it doesn't have enough bandwidth to transmit 1080p signals with Dolby True HD and DTS-HD signals. 1080p signals require twice the bandwidth of 1080i or 720p signals and Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD are both lossless pure audio technologies that require loads more in their own right. The bandwidth simply isn't there, digital or not.