i have a hunch he's gonna be the exception to the small market rule and stay with Minn

i understand what people are saying about the user base 4-1 ratio, but you also have to keep in mind there were plenty of people that went out and bought a PS3 just for this game so i'm not sure the 4=1 ratio is accurate given all the new PS3 owners. Either way, this game, and the series in general just keeps putting up numbers every time it comes out. good for them

what's up mont? i believe Donaghy for the most part. I saw the excerpts from his book and they are EXTREMELY detailed. Don't get me wrong i'm not saying he telling 100% of the truth, but even if half of what he says is accurate there is a SERIOUS problem. I've watched the NBA for a good 20 years and there have been countless questionable games. The funny thing is i feel like it's 5 years ago all over again. "We have a questionable person who has zero credibility. He's a liar, cheat, and a fraud, who is just trying to makeup lies about the league he used to work for in order to sell his book. You can't believe anything he says". Those were the SAME EXACT THINGS everyone said about Jose Canseco. 5 years later he turned out to be the MOST credible person, and it's hard for me to not think the same with Donaghy. David "Gotti" Stern has already strongarmed the publishing company that was set to release his book, lets see what else he can do to "silence" donaghy.

I've said this for 2 years now and nothing has changed my mind. I would take Lebron for the first 43 minutes of a game and Kobe for the last 5. I guess it's all subjective to who thinks which one is more important, the "vast majority" of the game or the "final" minutes. You all can decide

[QUOTE="sixringz1"]

no rashard lewis so it doesn't matter. You can't judge between the two teams when the most OBVIOUS mismatch between the 2 teams isn't on the court.

II-FBIsniper-II

no rashard lewis so it doesn't matter. You can't judge between the two teams when the most OBVIOUS mismatch between the 2 teams isn't on the court.

manny and no floyd won't fight him cause he will want the majority of the purse and won't get it. Mayweather is money first, fighter second.

my man mont13. been a few months. But to help you out w/ your question the Cavs will NOT do anything in the playoffs this year. And before i get "but it's early, you have to give them time to gel", let me tell you why. They NEVER addressed their issue from last year. They can't defend an athletic 4 that can go outside and shoot. And if you can't defend that, you BETTER be able to score on the other end to cancel each other out. Well that aint happening cause Varajeo is their 4, and he does neither. They picked up Moon but he won't be the answer. The 2 players i can think of that would put the Cavs over the top and are free agents are Stoudamire and Bosh. Both are athletic enough to guard a 4 on the inside and outside, and either can consistantly give you 20+ per game. You gotta get shaq out cause he clogs up the lane, which prevents James from doing what he does best and that's driving and finishing or kicking out(please look at steve nash for proof on that one). Their perfect roster that is possible would be Mo at pg, Parker at sg (only cause he's bigger than west), James at the 3, Stoudamire/Bosh at the 4 and a young athletic center at the 5. Doesn't even need to be a top notch center, just someone big who can run the floor (even a tyson chandler type could help).

The bottom line is i doubt there will be a big enough move made during the season to fix this, so it will be another early exit in the playoffs for the cavs. Ifeverybody stays healthy this year has Boston (maybe orlando) Vs Lakers or Denver. I don't expect Clv to be a factor as currently constructed. Sure i'll be talking to you again Mont;)

this isn't meant to sound mean, but it sounds like you are too worried about what someone else thinks of you, and you aren't standing your ground. If games, or any hobby for that matter, in anyway dictate your personality and change the type of person you are then that's a problem. But if you're a good person, andyou aren't breaking any laws then it shouldn't be a problem. You want to be with someone for the person YOU ARE, and all that comes with you. If you meet a girl and say one of my hobbies is to play video games from time to time, and they judge you, you don't want to be with that kind of person. By the way i'm just a couple years younger than you, so i'm not speaking from some hypothetical stance.

gamestats.com

they give reviews for older "games" not "systems" if that's what you meant. gamestats is a very underrated site. it's just like metacritic and gamerankings except it has reviews for FAR MORE games. I don't know why it gets no love on this site