SD signals with a HDTV never mix well. They'll always look like crap on a HDTV.Flame_Blade88Not always. It depends on the the quality of the TV. Some of them display SD better than others and that's a mistake people make when buying and HDTV, they think that the only thing that matters is the HD or 1080p logo on the box.
soulreaper-4's forum posts
the 80gb mgs4 edition doesnt have full bc :(MethodManFTWYou are right it have limited bc. Anyway the first 60GB model is the most valuable follow by this 80GB model. SD cards slots, 4 USBs and full PS2 and PS1 bc, that was very cool. even the exterior is made of better material than the current slim models and they had touch pannel for on, off and eject funtions and power swith on the back. This comes from someone with a Slim model so i am not trolling.
You're correct.I dont think so. With Peace Walker and Ghost of Sparta coming, it would be dumb of Sony to kill the original PSP.
JohnnyWPSP
[QUOTE="Emandudeguy"]
That's a bunch of crap, the PS2 had games in development for it in 2007, the PS3 came out in 2006, your argument is invalid.
It still seems kind of rushed.
No it is not rushed, handhelds have a smaller life span then home consoles, plus Sony made some great games for the ps2 only months before the announcement of the ps3, plus with the new 3DS which will have much better graphics and other features being showed off in e3 2010, if they don't show psp2 then they will be finished. Yeah handhelds have a smaller life span then home consoles. What about the Gameboy, lunch in the 1989 and the succesor was lunch in 1998? Seriously if they lunch a PS2 it will cost like $250 the same as a GO without nothing. There are even a lot of people that can't buy a PSP 3000 and some like you only thing of the next more expensive thing to come. Just have fun with what you have at the moment there are a lot of great games comining to the PSP plus the 3DS may end up being just a Nintendo made PSP. Look at the Wii, nothing close to the PS3 or 360.[QUOTE="XenoLair"]A companies priority should not be to only turn profit, Nintendo was different 10 years ago and even more different 20 years ago..GabuEx
Evidence?
10 to 20 years ago Nintendo was more like Sony is today. At lunch they where selling consoles more powerful than the last ones at a lost and they had more quality tittles from third partys. I AM NOT A TROLL AND I DON'T HAVE INTENTIONS TO CAUSE A SYSTEM WAR DEBATE HERE TO GET BAN FROM MODS HERE but the truth about Nintendo this gen is they really are ripping off all of us customers.The Wii is basically an minor upgrade from the GameCube, most GameCube games look better than the ones from the Wii, almost all third party games suck, they don't have an online system like the PS3 or 360, they have taken a lot of time to lunch games like Mario Galaxy and have took an eternity to lunch the next Zelda. From the start they promised the wii was going to be more powerful than the original Xbox and right now at the moment the only game to demostrate this is Mario Galaxy and the upcoming sequel, they promise a revolution with motion controls telling us even in the official Nintendo magazine imposible possibilitys like exact movement detections.
The worst part they charge us $39.99 for a Remote, $19.99 for just a stick and now $19.99 for a motion plus accessorie. That's $60.00 dollars per controllers that even need batterys wile the competition have controllers with more buttons, two sticks and integrated batterys that can be charged . In my opinion the GameCube had more quality games available in less time. Sure this gen Nintendo franshises games are better but last gen they had more variety and more third party quality games.
Log in to comment