starwarsgeek112's forum posts

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"] Not sure if serious .....topsemag55
The graphics in Zelda are cartoonish compared to games from BioWare and CD Projekt Red. There are better adventures than that game, and any serious gamer would prefer ME or Witcher over Zelda. Choosing between Witcher and Zelda is like choosing betwen NCIS and Sesame Street - most will pick Witcher and NCIS.:D



Sesame Street is a better and more influential show than NCIS, but I would say choosing between the Witcher and Zelda is like choosing from a generic R rated movie and UP. I'm guessing you probably didn't even bother watching that movie though, because it looks to childish. I'm not saying I don't like the Witcher but it's portrayal of adult themes.. especially sex, seems to be marketed at teens who still think it's cool because it's taboo in their lives.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]

[QUOTE="Skreltch"]

I dont go into my 8 year old sisters room to hang out, so no, I dont pay attention to the games on her system. I do know that putting the bomb on the crack in the wall, and shooting my sling shot got old about 20 years ago, and that nothing Nintendo could possibly do could make the game even close to Batman AC (pc) in terms of gameplay or graphics, or the Witcher 2, or Skyrim (pc) for an absolute fact without ever needing to actually look.

Skreltch

So you're basically admitting you have no idea what you're talking about?

I know exactly what I am talking about.

You admit to knowing nothing about the game but then claim that you don't need to know anything to actually know things about the game... Please explain to me how that makes any sense.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="topsemag55"] It should, as it seems to be for very young players, not adults. Mass Effect and Witcher are miles above any Zelda game in every way - gameplay, graphics, storyline, appeal to adults, you name it.topsemag55

not

:|

A Zelda fan always responds like that.:o

All video games are made for kids.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

I really doubt it will flop. From what I understand GamesTM, Edge, and Game Informer don't hand out such high scores easily. However, I think Dark Sould or Skyrim have a pretty good chance of being GOTY.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

MGS4 or SMG2 if we're going by Gamespot's reviews.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

[QUOTE="bri360"]

[QUOTE="SHATT3R3D-GLASS"]

Out of those screenshots, it looks like a game developed for the PS2. Nothing else matters.

SHATT3R3D-GLASS

Yeah I agree with that, it doesnt look impressive at all. There are ps2 games that are definitely comparable to it. Judging from those screenshots anyways.

Though a huge amount of Nintendo fans are trying to convince me there are not... I pity them somehow.



And I pity your ignorance...

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

[QUOTE="Thunderdrone"]

[QUOTE="SHATT3R3D-GLASS"]

Hmm, you're not serious.

SHATT3R3D-GLASS

Here ya go

VS

http://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/CJ_GTA.jpg

Wow, don't say you just compared SA to concept art from SS.



That's not concept art...

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

$10 for 6FT and it really high quality. Not like them $0.06Chinese cables. I bought 6 of them and they are just as good as Monster cables.

http://www.amazon.com/Mediabridge-Ultra-Ethernet-Certified-Available/dp/B0019EHU8G

Truth_Hurts_U



Honestly, it's probably better to by the cheap $1.00 ones. It's a digital signal... the signal can't be any worse on one hdmi cord vs another. The build quality could be lower but I have never had one of these things break.

Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

11

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]

Civ V is looking pretty tempting at $12.50 but I wont have a computer that can play it till the end of the month... eh what to do.

Just-Breathe

You could buy it now and install it on your computer when you get it.



I know but it's not really a game I am dying to play at the moment and it would pretty much just be an impulse buy. I'm also planning on getting Red Orchestra 2, and I feel like I would end up playing that instead of Civ V.. but damn is $12.50 cheap. I swear Steam sales are going to be the end of me.